Showing results for virg xped new promo code tanzania

“Personality vs. Personalization” in AI Systems: Responsible Design and Risk Management (Part 4)
[…] to giving users insight into whether a chatbot provider may use data gathered to enable personalization features for model training purposes. Chatbot and companions’ conversational interfaces create new opportunities for users to understand what data is gathered about them, for what purposes, and take actions that can have legal effects (e.g., requesting that data […]

“Personality vs. Personalization” in AI Systems: Intersection with Evolving U.S. Law (Part 3)
[…] in connection with these users may implicate specific adolescent privacy protections. For example, several states have passed or modified their existing comprehensive data privacy laws to impose new opt-in requirements, rights, and obligations on organizations processing children or teen’s data (e.g., imposing new impact assessment requirements and duties of care). Legislators have also advanced […]

“Personality vs. Personalization” in AI Systems: Specific Uses and Concrete Risks (Part 2)
[…] with human preferences, can contribute to sycophancy by causing systems to strive for user satisfaction and positivity rather than confront delusional behavior. While technology-driven loneliness is not new, sycophantic AI companions and chatbots can contribute to a decline in the user’s mental wellbeing (e.g., suicidal ideation) and the disintegration of friendships, romantic relationships, and […]

“Personality vs. Personalization” in AI Systems: An Introduction (Part 1)
[…] more intelligent features,” May 14, 2024, Google Meta “You can tell Meta AI to remember certain things about you (like that you love to travel and learn new language), and it can also pick up important details based on context. For example, let’s say you’re hungry for breakfast and ask Meta AI for some […]

AI Regulation in Latin America: Overview and Emerging Trends in Key Proposals
[…] AI for economic and societal progress; (iii) have a strong preference for ex ante, risk-based regulation; (iv) introduce institutional multistakeholder frameworks for AI governance, either by creating new agencies or assigning responsibility to existing ones, and (v) have specific provisions for responsible innovation and controlled testing of AI technologies. You may find a comparative […]

A Price to Pay: U.S. Lawmaker Efforts to Regulate Algorithmic and Data-Driven Pricing
[…] conducting a 6(b) investigation to study how firms are engaging in so-called “surveillance pricing,” and the release of preliminary insights from this study in early 2025. With new FTC leadership signalling that continuing the study is not a priority, state lawmakers have stepped in to scrutinize certain pricing schemes involving algorithms and personal data. […]

The “Neural Data” Goldilocks Problem: Defining “Neural Data” in U.S. State Privacy Laws
[…] category of “neural data.” Each of these laws defines “neural data” in related but distinct ways, raising a number of important questions: just how broad should this new data type be? How can lawmakers draw clear boundaries for a data type that, in theory, could apply to anything that reveals an individual’s mental activity? […]

FPF at PDP Week 2025: Generative AI, Digital Trust, and the Future of Cross-Border Data Transfers in APAC
[…] focusing on making the industry more capable of using AI responsibly. Wan Sie pointed to AI Verify, Singapore’s AI governance testing framework and toolkit, and the IMDA’s new Global AI Assurance Sandbox, as mechanisms that help organizations ensure their AI systems could demonstrate greater trustworthiness to users. Josh focused on trends from across the […]

Balancing Innovation and Oversight: Regulatory Sandboxes as a Tool for AI Governance
[…] a controlled environment, usually combining regulatory oversight with reduced enforcement. Sandboxes often encourage organizations to use real-world data in novel ways, with companies and regulators learning how new data practices are aligned – or misaligned – with existing governance frameworks. The lessons learned can inform future data practices and potential regulatory revisions. In recent […]

Practical Takeaways from FPF’s Privacy Enhancing Technologies Workshop
[…] adoption of these technologies and their intersection with data protection laws. Mastercard’s Chief Privacy Officer, Caroline Louveaux, presented the first PET, a privacy-preserving technology tested in a new cross-border fraud detection system. Louveaux presented how the system employs Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE), a technique that enables analysis of encrypted data, and the participants discussed […]