Search results

[…] State AI Report. From a compliance perspective, disclosure standards provide tangible obligations for developers to operationalize. From a consumer protection standpoint, legislators view them as tools to promote transparency, prevent deception, and curb excessive engagement by reminding users, especially minors, that they are interacting with an AI system. B. Safety Protocols and Risk Mitigation […]

[…] and ownership of Banco Popular instruments. Those deemed eligible could then submit comments through an online form. More than 23,000 comments were received, each assigned an alphanumeric code. In June 2019, the SRB transferred 1,104 comments relevant to the valuation to Deloitte via a secure server. Deloitte never received the underlying identification data or […]

[…] stakeholder communities. FPF provides this platform to foster diverse perspectives and informed discussion. There has been much interest in the report on European competitiveness issued in September 2024 by former Italian Prime Minister and European Central Bank President Mario Draghi at the request of European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, which calls for […]

[…] Chart: Risk Assessment (DPIA) Requirements in California, Colorado, and the EU California Colorado EU FPF Analysis: CA v. CO References California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.185, subd. (a)(15) Colorado Privacy Act (CPA) Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-1-1309 General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Article 35 This comparison chart focuses on the […]

[…] of the most significant yet. Starting January 1, 2026, businesses will be subject to extensive new obligations concerning automated decisionmaking technology (ADMT), risk assessments, and cybersecurity audits. Today, the Future of Privacy Forum released an issue brief covering these extensive new regulations, providing stakeholders a comprehensive overview of these new legal requirements and context […]

[…] of the most significant yet. Starting January 1, 2026, businesses will be subject to extensive new obligations concerning automated decisionmaking technology (ADMT), risk assessments, and cybersecurity audits. Today, the Future of Privacy Forum released an issue brief covering these extensive new regulations, providing stakeholders a comprehensive overview of these new legal requirements and context […]

G en era ti ve AI fo r Org an iz a ti on al Use : I n te rn al Polic y Cons id era tio ns F u tu re of Priv a cy Fo ru m , up d ate d Ju ne 20 24 C O NSID ER ATIO NS […]

[…] role in shaping “well-balanced AI policies beyond our borders—especially in the absence of a comprehensive federal framework.” Supporters view the bill as a critical first step toward promoting transparency and reducing serious safety risks, while critics argue its requirements could be unduly burdensome on AI developers, potentially inhibiting innovation. These debates come as New […]

[…] strong concern that replicating the EU AI Act could create regulatory overreach. However, civil society groups argue that even comprehensive frameworks like the Colorado AI Act or Virginia’s HB 2094 (vetoed) are significantly narrower in scope and that highlighting that superficial similarities with the EU AI Act, such as shared definitions or structural references, […]

[…] AI development and deployment.  Enforcement tools and defense strategies: Legislatures expanded Attorney General investigative powers (such as civil investigative demands) in bills including Texas’ TRAIGA (enacted) and Virginia HB 2094 (vetoed). A variety of other defense mechanisms were introduced, including specific protections for whistleblowers, as represented in California’s SB 53 (enrolled). Looking Ahead to […]