Search results

[…] are relevant for the Member States of the EU: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Republic of Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden; as well as the Member States of the European Economic Area: Iceland, Liechtenstein and […]

[…] case of a failure by the infringer to rectify a problem which was previously identified by the regulator, or to follow previous ICO recommendations. Lastly, for the Latvia DPA, the existence of past breaches counts as an aggravating circumstance when determining the fine, whereas a lack of past offenses does not put the infringer […]

[…] summaries of 15 DPAs’ strategic documents from DPAs in France (FR), Portugal (PT), Belgium (BE), Norway (NO), Sweden (SE), Ireland (IE), Bulgaria (BG), Denmark (DK), Finland (FI), Latvia (LV), Lithuania (LT), Luxembourg (LU) and Germany (Bavaria). The analysis also includes documents published by the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) and the European Data Protection […]

[…] summaries of 15 DPAs’ strategic documents from DPAs in France (FR), Portugal (PT), Belgium (BE), Norway (NO), Sweden (SE), Ireland (IE), Bulgaria (BG), Denmark (DK), Finland (FI), Latvia (LV), Lithuania (LT), Luxembourg (LU) and Germany (Bavaria). The analysis also includes documents published by the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) and the European Data Protection […]

[…] …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 14 A.4 Norway ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 17 A.5 Sweden ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 18 A.6 Ireland …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 20 A.7 Bulgaria …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 23 A.8 Denmark …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 23 A.9 Finland ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 26 A.10 Latvia …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 26 A.11 Lithuania ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 28 A.12 Luxembourg …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 28 A.13 Germany (Bavaria) ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 31 A.14 EDPS ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 32 3 1. Introduction The European Data Protection […]

[…] …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 14 A.4 Norway ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 17 A.5 Sweden ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 18 A.6 Ireland …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 20 A.7 Bulgaria …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 23 A.8 Denmark …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 23 A.9 Finland ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 26 A.10 Latvia …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 26 A.11 Lithuania ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 28 A.12 Luxembourg …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 28 A.13 Germany (Bavaria) ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 31 A.14 EDPS ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 32 3 1. Introduction The European Data Protection […]

[…] of administrative cases. The tram comp any challenged the decision of the police and won in first instance. The appeal court asked the Data Protection Authority of Latvia for an Opinion in the matter. The DPA argued that the law governing the handling of administrative cases is special law and it precludes the data […]

[…] of administrative cases. The tram comp any challenged the decision of the police and won in first instance. The appeal court asked the Data Protection Authority of Latvia for an Opinion in the matter. The DPA argued that the law governing the handling of administrative cases is special law and it precludes the data […]

[…] and less prescriptive than what is required under the CCPA. Adopts Narrow Outlier Provisions: The bill selects particular narrow approaches used by only a handful of states: Virginia’s narrow biometric data definition (which broadly exempts photos, videos, and audio without limiting language), the pseudonymous data exception for consumer opt-out rights (Tennessee, Iowa, Florida, Alabama […]

2024 ANNUAL REPORT FUTURE OF PRIVACY FORUM 1 FUTURE OF PRIVACY FORUM | ANNUAL REPORT 2024 CONTENTS About Future of Privacy Forum ____________________ 2 FPF’s Workstreams & Regions _____________________ 3 Leadership Letter _______________________________ 4 Overview Focused on Key Areas ___________________ 5 U.S. Landscape _________________________________ 5 Global ______________________________________ 9 Center for AI _______________________________ 12 FPF Analyses […]