Search results

[…] year was more due to chance than anything else, and next year will return to business-as-usual. After all, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Massachusetts, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Vermont, and West Virginia all had bills make it to a floor vote or progress into cross-chamber, and some of those bills have been carried over into the 2026 legislative […]

[…] all designed to meet the unique and changing nee ds of research and education. AARNet works closely with the research and education sector, industry, and government to promote a safe and secure internet environment, fostering innovation while protecting the integrity of Australia’s digital infrastructure. Learn more at aarnet.edu.au. YOUTH PRIVACY IN AUSTRALIA: INSIGHTS FROM […]

[…] enacted. Although no new states ha ve joined the ranks, lawmakers have continued to evolve existing laws, as California, Colorado, Connecticut, Kentucky, Montana, Oregon, Texas, Utah, and Virginia all amended their respective laws in 2025. This report summarizes that legislative landscape, compares and contrasts the prevailing models for state laws, and identifies the critical […]

[…] all designed to meet the unique and changing nee ds of research and education. AARNet works closely with the research and education sector, industry, and government to promote a safe and secure internet environment, fostering innovation while protecting the integrity of Australia’s digital infrastructure. Learn more at arnet.edu.au YOUTH PRIVACY IN AUSTRALIA: INSIGHTS FROM […]

[…] 2019, the SRB transferred 1,104 comments relevant to the valuation to Deloitte via a secure server. Deloitte never received the underlying identification data or the key linking codes to individuals. Several participants complained to the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) that they had not been informed of this disclosure to Deloitte. In a revised […]

[…] strong concern that replicating the EU AI Act could create regulatory overreach. However, civil society groups argue that even comprehensive frameworks like the Colorado AI Act or Virginia’s HB 2094 (vetoed) are significantly narrower in scope and that highlighting that superficial similarities with the EU AI Act, such as shared definitions or structural references, […]

[…] through user-generated input. For example, a 2015 claim against Snap, Inc. survived Section 230 dismissal following a claim that a specific “Speed Filter” Snapchat feature (since discontinued) promoted reckless driving.  In other cases, the personalization of a system through demographic-based targeting that causes harm may also implicate tort and product liability law when organizations […]

ai,ethics,or,ai,law,concept.,developing,ai,codes,of

[…] bills contain such exemptions—legislation might still inadvertently capture other accepted practices such as specials aligned with seasonal changes, bulk purchase discounts, deals on goods nearing expiration, or promotions to clear inventory. Lawmakers must also consider how any new definitions interact with definitions in existing law. For example, an early version of California AB 446, […]

[…] for “Competition/Data Protection in an AI World.” Joined by Maureen Ohlhausen, Partner at Wilson Sonsini and Peter Swire, FPF Senior Fellow, and J.Z. Liang Chair at the Georgia Institute of Technology, this panel asked discussants to consider the key intersection between privacy and competition in the age of AI, focusing specifically on how regulators […]