Search results

[…] PRIVACY IN AUSTRALIA: INSIGHTS FROM NATIONAL POLICY DIALOGUES 1 I. INTRODUCTION _____________________________________________ 2 II. BACKGROUND _____________________________________________ 3 III. KEY THEMES AND TAKEAWAYS _______________________________ 4 1. Bridging Divides Between Privacy, Safety, and Security _____________ 4 2. Learning from Past Technologies to Inform Emerging Ones ___________ 4 3. Encryption, Identity, and the Unintended Consequences of Safety […]

[…] enacted. Although no new states ha ve joined the ranks, lawmakers have continued to evolve existing laws, as California, Colorado, Connecticut, Kentucky, Montana, Oregon, Texas, Utah, and Virginia all amended their respective laws in 2025. This report summarizes that legislative landscape, compares and contrasts the prevailing models for state laws, and identifies the critical […]

[…] n (R )e vo lu tio n? ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ______________ 8 3 .1 . BRID G IN G TH E GAP BET W EEN AI IN NO VATIO N AN D REG ULA TIO N __ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ _____ 8 3 .2 . TH E […]

[…] networking among peers, fostering new connections and addressing common challenges. We anticipate lively group discussions and encourage active participation from each attendee. (Chatham House Rules & FPF’s Code of Conduct are to be followed please). Hotel Information Yours Truly DC Hotel is located at 1143 New Hampshire Ave NW, Washington, DC 20037. Located just steps […]

[…] n (R )e vo lu tio n? ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ______________ 8 3 .1 . BRID G IN G TH E GAP BET W EEN AI IN NO VATIO N AN D REG ULA TIO N __ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ _____ 8 3 .2 . TH E […]

[…] PRIVACY IN AUSTRALIA: INSIGHTS FROM NATIONAL POLICY DIALOGUES 1 I. INTRODUCTION _____________________________________________ 2 II. BACKGROUND _____________________________________________ 3 III. KEY THEMES AND TAKEAWAYS _______________________________ 4 1. Bridging Divides Between Privacy, Safety, and Security _____________ 4 2. Learning from Past Technologies to Inform Emerging Ones ___________ 4 3. Encryption, Identity, and the Unintended Consequences of Safety […]

[…] reflected in crossed -out purple. Deletions of text in Senate version are reflected in crossed-out purple with underlining. This document is possible thanks to the ongoing collaboration between IAPP and FPF . Comparison completed 26 November 2025. Redline v ersion cred it to: – Cobun Zweifel -Keegan , Managing Director, Washington, D.C. , IAPP […]

[…] process to assess whether former shareholders and creditors were entitled to compensation. Deloitte was appointed as an independent auditor to evaluate whether they would have received a better valuation under regular insolvency proceedings. In August 2018, the SRB published its preliminary decision, opening a two-phase “right to be heard” process. Shareholders and creditors first […]

[…] high risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons. Art. 35(1). DPAs are required where processing activities pose some heightened risk of harm. A key difference between these regulations is whether that standard is exhaustive or open . Both California’s and Colorado’s regulations provide a list of activities that present a significant or […]

[…] data protection rules. K ey poin ts ● The lack of clear regulatory guidance forces organizations to rely on best practices, trust, and adherence to local laws between/across jurisdictions; ● No one PET or technology can address every risk or threat; in many cases, multiple PET s and privacy protections are beneficial and can […]