Search results

[…] [FN101] . Victoria Groom, What’s the Best Role for a Robot? Cybernetic Models of Existing and Proposed Human-Robot Interaction Structures, ICINCO 2008, 325, available at ht- tp://chime.stanford.edu/ downloads/groom_robot_role_ICINCO_ 2008.pdf (last visited Nov. 8, 2009). [FN102] . See MacDorman & Ishiguro, supra note 27, at 298. [FN103] . Robin Marantz Henig, The Real Transformers, N.Y. […]

[…] Website.” PEREZ HILTON: Holly wood’s Most Hated Website , WOLFMAN PRODUCTIONS .COM , archived at http://www.webcitation.org/5wub4zWnp. 282 . See Emily Price, 100M Facebook Profiles Now Available for Download , PC WORLD , Jul. 28, 2010, archived at http://www.webcitation.org/5wudtAqw7 (detailin g the harvesting of Facebook personal information from profiles). 283 . DAVID BRIN , THE […]

[…] Security Lab at Princeton, formerly at Georgia Tech. Its effect is to inject an invisible element into the page, which will then instruct the visitor’s browser to download and execute a piece of code. 2 The cod e in question performs censorship measurement : it further instructs the visitor’s browser to access content from […]

[…] 27, 2000 87Joseph Turow Et Al., Open To Exploitation: Ameri can Shoppers Online And Offline, Annenberg School of Communications, Departmental Papers, June 2005 , available at http://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/ Downloads/Information_And_Society/Turow_APPC_Report_WEB_FINAL.pdf p. 4 88 Nissenbaum , p. 211. 89 Marc Rotenberg, Fair Information Practices and the Architecture of Privacy: (What Larry Doesn’t Get) , 2001 STAN. TECH. […]

[…] e- mail accounts with personalized messa ges offering mortgage refinancing options, Viagra and hot stock tips? Do you realize that you are potentially contributing to your electronic, downloadable psychological profile every time you surf the Web? These questions represent vastly different scenarios but have a common denominator linking them together – the ab ility […]

[…] NIST Special Publication 800-63, http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-63/SP800-63V1_0_2. pdf (accessed 5 April 2011). [7]. Identity Assurance Framework: Assurance Levels , Britta Glade, Kantara Initiative Identity Assurance Work Group, 2009 http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/ download/attachme nts/38371432/Kant ara+IAF-1200-Levels+of+Assurance.pdf (accessed 8 April 2011). [8]. Trust and Digital Certificates , Peter Smith, Australian Payments Clearing Association, 6th Payment Systems International Conferen ce (Belgium, 2000). […]

[…] (last visited Sept. 30, 2009). 278 . See Creative Commons, International, http://creativecommons.org/international (last visited Sept. 30, 2009) (displaying the mission of the organization and tools available for download); Creative Commons Australia, http://www.creativecommons.org.au (last visited Sept. 30, 2009). 279 . Creative Commons, What is CC?, http://creativecommons.org/about/what -is-cc (last visited Se pt. 30, 2009). 280 . […]

[…] sharing of data with law enforcement•Data retention (especially when excluding apps that use the Google-Apple API)•Private sector transparency is lacking with respect to:•What apps have been vetted• Download counts•App permissions (iOS)•Original launch dates (Android) Questions•Is third-party evaluation of contact tracing for efficacy or privacy possible in the absence of these data?•Is accountability possible without […]

[…] Springer, 2010).      25    increase.  Debate about RFID for driver license, em ployee ID, employee monitoring in  the United States, are emerging in all countries wi th and without a legal privacy  framework.  Privacy and security sections of advanc ed research conferences on these  technology topics address privacy enhancing technol ogies (PETs) but lag in incorporation  of regulatory frameworks for privacy for end users.   The scholarly investigations will  require international teams of multi-disciplinary r esearchers of information technology,  wireless sensor technology, social sciences, law, a nd philosophy to anticipate the privacy  risks and the users concerns in protecting their pe rsonal data.      Although the technologies may start out as national ly homegrown, they must fulfill  international standards for commercial markets, thu s raising similar issues of privacy  protection in other countries of different politica l cultures.  The issues, though addressed  louder in some countries than others (and for diffe rent reasons) are beginning to echo  from different political cultures and meet on a con tinuum coming from opposite end  points.      If we simply view RFID, CCTV, and DOOH as surveilla nce tools in China, we miss the  privacy protection issue.  One is not exclusive of  the other. We must remember the  increasing use of surveillance technologies in demo cratic countries that debate privacy  protection vs. civil liberties.  As security threat s increase, citizens in liberal democratic  systems have called for increased surveillance agai nst the threat of terrorism and crime.   Are the threats that lead to relinquishing of some  privacy protections of a country that is  not acclimated to surveillance and data control (co untry A) and the move to heightened  awareness of personal information leaks in a countr y acclimated to surveillance (country  B) drawing closer on the continuum of personal data  protection?     Factor Two:  Consumer Information   […]

[…] Springer, 2010).      25    increase.  Debate about RFID for driver license, em ployee ID, employee monitoring in  the United States, are emerging in all countries wi th and without a legal privacy  framework.  Privacy and security sections of advanc ed research conferences on these  technology topics address privacy enhancing technol ogies (PETs) but lag in incorporation  of regulatory frameworks for privacy for end users.   The scholarly investigations will  require international teams of multi-disciplinary r esearchers of information technology,  wireless sensor technology, social sciences, law, a nd philosophy to anticipate the privacy  risks and the users concerns in protecting their pe rsonal data.      Although the technologies may start out as national ly homegrown, they must fulfill  international standards for commercial markets, thu s raising similar issues of privacy  protection in other countries of different politica l cultures.  The issues, though addressed  louder in some countries than others (and for diffe rent reasons) are beginning to echo  from different political cultures and meet on a con tinuum coming from opposite end  points.      If we simply view RFID, CCTV, and DOOH as surveilla nce tools in China, we miss the  privacy protection issue.  One is not exclusive of  the other. We must remember the  increasing use of surveillance technologies in demo cratic countries that debate privacy  protection vs. civil liberties.  As security threat s increase, citizens in liberal democratic  systems have called for increased surveillance agai nst the threat of terrorism and crime.   Are the threats that lead to relinquishing of some  privacy protections of a country that is  not acclimated to surveillance and data control (co untry A) and the move to heightened  awareness of personal information leaks in a countr y acclimated to surveillance (country  B) drawing closer on the continuum of personal data  protection?     Factor Two:  Consumer Information   […]