FPF Submits Comments to Inform California Children’s Social Media Protections Rulemaking Process
On June 30, the Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) submitted comments in response to the California Department of Justice’s (the Department’s) ongoing rulemaking process for the “Protecting Our Kids from Social Media Addiction Act” (the Act or SB 976). Signed into law in 2024, SB 976 bars operators of “addictive internet-based services” from providing an addictive feed to […]
FPF Releases Issue Brief on Navigating Cross-Border Data Transfers in the APAC region: An Analysis of Developments from 2023 to 2026
In September 2023, the Future of Privacy Forum’s (FPF)’s Asia-Pacific (APAC) office published an issue brief, “Navigating CBDTs in the Asia-Pacific Region,” that summarized key developments in the regulation of cross-border data transfers (CBDTs) across the region between 2021 and 2023. This Issue Brief serves as an update to the 2023 publication, analyzing the most […]
FPF Hosts Frontiers Workshop on Privacy, AI, and Emerging Infrastructure
On June 10, 2026, the FPF Center for Artificial Intelligence convened a Frontiers Workshop in Washington, DC. Held as part of FPF’s National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Department of Energy (DoE)-funded Privacy-Enhancing Technologies (PETs) Research Coordination Network, the workshop brought together privacy and frontier AI practitioners to examine challenges at the intersection of data governance […]
June 2026 Redline Comparison of the Children and Teens’ Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA 2.0)
On June 22, Chairman Brett Guthrie (R-KY) and Ranking Member Frank Pallone (D-NJ) of the House Energy and Commerce Committee announced a new Kids Internet and Digital Safety Act (KIDS Act) bill draft, representing a bipartisan compromise to the legislative package initially introduced in November 2025. Among several other proposals, this new KIDS Act bill […]
Personalization and Youth Online: Assessing Benefits, Risks, and Safeguards
Personalization—the use of personal data to tailor content and services to individual users—sits at the center of today’s most contested debates about youth and digital technology. This report provides a comprehensive framework for understanding personalization in youth online experiences, examining its mechanisms, benefits, risks, mitigations, and the emerging legislative and regulatory landscape.
PETs Use Case: Measuring Digital Literacy with Telemetry Data Using Differential Privacy
Digital literacy, loosely defined as competency with a range of digital technologies, is a key skill for full social and democratic participation, but it is a difficult thing to measure across a large population. Having accurate data about how people use technology can inform how educators, policymakers, and technology companies make decisions and are especially […]
Comparison of Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PETs)
This comparative reference chart covers seven PETs — Differential Privacy, Synthetic Data, Federated Learning, Trusted Execution Environments, Secure Multi-Party Computation, Homomorphic Encryption, and Zero-Knowledge Proofs — across six dimensions: approach, benefits, limitations, example use case, data utility impact, and implementation complexity. The chart is designed as a standalone reference for practitioners who need to quickly […]
Privacy Enhancing Technologies for EdTech Service Providers
Educational research answers questions about program effectiveness, equity, access, and long‑term outcomes. EdTech vendors typically need student-level data and enough context to ensure their research is effective and accomplishes their goal. At the same time, disclosing student data to EdTech vendors may increase the risk of reidentification. The risk is not limited to direct identifiers […]
Privacy Enhancing Technologies for Education Researchers
Educational research answers questions about program effectiveness, equity, access, and long‑term outcomes. Researchers typically need student-level data and enough context to ensure their research is effective and accomplishes their goal. At the same time, disclosing student data to researchers may increase the risk of reidentification. The risk is not limited to direct identifiers such as […]
Privacy Enhancing Technologies for State Education Agencies
This report describes the Privacy-Enhancing Technologies (PETs) most relevant to State Education Agencies (SEAs) and Statewide Longitudinal Data Systems (SLDS) environments, explains what each can and cannot do analytically and operationally, and provides use case guidance for matching PET selection to specific workflows. PETs complement rather than replace strong governance — data minimization, least-privilege access, […]
