Search results

[…] will  not  shield  from  disclosure  statements  made  by  a  client  to  his  or  her  attorney  in  the  pres ence  of  a  third  party  who  is  not  an  agent  of  either  the  client  or  attorney.  .  .  .  (T)he  presence   of  (  )  a  third  party  defeats  the  privilege  even  though  the  client  may  […]

[…] that a second photo using facial recognition technology (recently approved by the FTC) o Allows schools (section M of the COPPA FAQ) to act as a parents agent and can consent to the collection of kids’ information on a parents behalf but the ability to consent its limited to the educational context – solely […]

[…] providing  reason  to  believe  that  the  traffic  data  pertains  to   an  individual  guilty  of  a  criminal  offense  of  sufficient  seriousness  or  pertains  to  a  sus- pected  agent of a foreign power.                                                                                                                            373  50 U.S.C.A. § 1842 (West 2003 & Supp. 2007).  374  18 U.S.C. § 3122; 50 U.S.C. § 1842.  375  50 U.S.C. § 1842(a)(1).  376  18 U.S.C.A. § 2709 (West 2000 & Supp. 2007); 50 U. S.C.A. § 1861 (West 2003 & Supp.  2007).  377 The standard I propose here is similar to that ado pted by a recent legislative proposal  aimed at regulating NSLs. National Security Letter  Reform Act of 2007, S. 2088, 110th Cong.  (2007).  Though  I  suggest  borrowing  some  of  the  […]

[…] concerning a pers on against that pers on s uch as identity theft, the leaking of c las s ified infor mat ion that reveals an undercover agent, and the us e of a drunk -driving s us pect‘s blood as evidence agains t him) . 60 See London Economics Study, supra not e […]

[…] to protect the vulner- able party from abuse as a result of the power or influence imbalance in the relationship. Cooley observed that confidential relations exist between agent and principal, trustor and trustee, parent and child, and husband and wife, 64. Steele v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 3 Binn. 306, 313 (Pa. 1811). 65.Developments in […]

[…] card company records can reveal where one eats and shops and which cultural events one attends. The government can obtain one’s travel destinations and activities from travel agent records. From hotel records, it can discover the numbers a person dialed and the pay-per-view movies a person watched. 22 The government can potentially 20 . […]

[…] puter-generated partners, including a dog, a cartoon dog, and a person. [FN174] The experimenters found that “participants kept their *838 promises significantly more with the human-like interface agent.” [FN175] “Cooperation in- creased when people ‘talked’ with their interface agent, i.e., discussed their common situation with it, before privatelychoosing whether or not to cooperate” [FN176] […]

[…] misuse than it is with post-violation remedies. CHART II – A SAMPLE OF STATE LAWS INDIRECTLY TARGETING PII COLLECTION STATE STATUTORY COVERAGE CONNECTICUT Requires insurance institutions or agents to provide notice of PII practices in relationship to insurance transactions. 177 GEORGIA The General Assembly found that “the privacy and financial security of individuals in […]

[…] 96 The “relevancy and necessity” requirement is thus  potentially as helpful for  the agency as for the U.S. citizens it protects. It  should not be hard to show that all  information gathered on an individual in the course  of a criminal investigation is  “relevant and necessary” to that investigation; how ever, it should be hard to show that  information gathered about U.S. citizens not associ ated with a criminal investigation is  relevant and necessary to the agency’s purpose.    The second maintenance exemption, (e)(5), concerns  an even more fundamental  requirement, one that appears to minimally impinge  on an agency’s flexibility. When  making a determination regarding an individual, the  agency must maintain records with  such “accuracy, relevance, timeliness and completen ess” as is “reasonably necessary” to  assure fairness to that individual. DHS again expla ins that “in the collection of  information for law enforcement and protective purp oses it is impossible to determine in  advance what information is accurate, relevant, tim ely, and complete. Compliance…  would preclude Secret Service DHS  agents from using  their investigative and protecting  training and exercising good judgment to both condu ct and report on investigations or  other protective activities”. 97    First, this reasoning is a misinterpretation of th e requirement of (e)(5). Subsection  (e)(5) does not mandate that information entering t he system must be accurate, relevant,  timely, and complete. The provision instead mandate s that agency determinations be                                                     96 Ed Felten,  Needle-in-a-Haystack Problems , Freedom to Tinker, Apr. 23, 2010, http://www.free dom-to- tinker.com/blog/felten/needle-haystack-problems (ob serving that for problems with “big haystacks”, where  the right answer is very difficult to determine in  advance, there is a good chance of arriving at the  wrong  answer; to solve the problem, you need to either “r educe the size of the haystack, or improve our proc edure  […]

[…] effect, including tools, training and education; 3 –Systems for internal, ongoing oversight and assurance reviews and external verification (including assessments by privacy enforcement or third -party accountability agents); 4- Transparency and mechanisms for individual participation (beyond mere privacy notices) 5- Means for remediation and external enforcement (acknowledged as ultimately resting with local legal authorities). […]