Search results

ON PRIVACY: LIBERTY IN THE DIGITAL REVOL UTION Christina M. Gagnier * Cite as 11 J. HIGH TECH . L. 229 (2011) In the dorm room of some college freshman Political Science major at Any College U.S.A is a copy of John Stuart Mill’s On Liberty shoved under the bed. 1 Mill’s On Liberty , […]

1 New Directions in Privacy: Disclosure, Unfairness and Externalities Privacy Law Scholars Conference June 2010 Mark MacCarthy Georgetown University ―…the solution to regulating information flow is not to radically curtail the collection of information, but to regulate uses.‖ 1 I. INTRODUCTION Several developments in 2009 and 2010 underscore d a return of public concerns about […]

SOLOVE .DOC 2/2/2006 4:27:56 PM 357 A MODEL REGIME OF PRIVACY PROTECTION Daniel J. Solove* Chris Jay Hoofnagle** A series of major security breaches at companies with sensitive personal information has sparked significant attention to the prob- lems with privacy protection in the United States. Currently, the pri- vacy protections in the United States are […]

[…] a way to stop such sharing. 5. P RIVACY POLICY AMENDMENTS In all, 92% of the Top 25 discussed amendments to th eir privacy policies. Five companies promised that amendments would not take the place of past po licies under which customers submitted PII – i.e., amendments are not binding on past customers. Four […]

[…] identity: An unproven orthodoxy The past decade is littered with earnest identity ini tiatives that failed to get off the ground and security industry consortia that over- promised and under-delivered. We’ve endured endless deconstructions of “trust” and theoretical diss ertations on “identity” but none of this work has led to the sort of breakthrough […]

Sponsoring Trust in Tomorrow’s Technology: Towards a Global Digital Infrastructure Policy By John Miller and David Hoffman The information contained in this document represents the current view of Intel Corporation on the issues discussed as of the date of publication. This document is for informational purposes only. INTEL MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, […]

1 PRIVACY INVASIVE GEO -MASHUPS: PRIVACY 2.0 AND THE LIMITS OF FIRST GENERATION INFORMATI ON PRIVACY LAWS Mark Burdon † ABSTRACT Online technological advances are pioneering the wider distribution of geospatial information for general mapping purposes. The use of popular web – based applications, such as Google Maps, is ensuring that mapping based applications are […]

Corey A. Ciocchetti n r r 55 American Business Law Journal n Id. F F See, e.g Personal Information in Government Records: Protecting the Public Interest In Privacy 63, 118 & n.332 (2006) (defining personally identifying information with reference to the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C.552a(a)(4) (2000)); TRUSTe,Guidance on Model Web Site Disclosures, http://www.truste.org/docs/Model_Privacy_ […]

Dispelling the Myths Surrounding De-identification: Anonymization Remains a Strong Tool for Protecting Privacy Ann Cavoukian, Ph.D. Information & Privacy Commissioner, Ontario, Canada June 2011 Khaled El Emam, Ph.D. Canada Research Chair in Electronic Health Information, CHEO Research Institute and University of Ottawa Table of Contents Introduction ……………………………………………………………… ………. 1 Questioning the Value of De-identification ………………………………. […]

DRAFT – PUBLISHED IN WINTER 2002 -2003 1 Cookies, The Constitution, and The Common Law: A Framework for the Right of Privacy on The Internet M ATTHEW C. KECK * That the individual shall have the full protection in person and in property is a principle as old as the common law; but it has […]