Search results

Privacy Papers for Policy Makers 2011 Cover The publication of “Privacy Papers for Policy Makers” was supported by AT&T and Microsoft. Inside front cover September 7, 2011 We are delighted to provide you with the second annual compilation entitled “Privacy Papers for Policy Makers,” showcasing leading analytical thinking about current and emerging privacy issues. The […]

1 To Track or “Do Not Track”: Advancing Transparency and =ndividual Control in Online Behavioral Advertising Omer Tene 1 and Jules Polonetsky 2 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ………………………….. ………………………….. ………………………….. ……………………….. 2 2. Online tracking devices ………………………….. ………………………….. ………………………….. ……….. 3 2.1. Cookies ………………………….. ………………………….. ………………………….. ………………………….. 4 2.2. Flash Cookies ………………………….. ………………………….. ………………………….. […]

harvard Privacy is one ofthe most important concepts ofour time, yetitis also oneofthe most elusive. Asrapidly changing technology makes information increasingly available, scholars, activists, andpolicymakers have struggled todefine privacy, withmany con- ceding thatthetask isvirtually impossible. In this concise andlucid book, Daniel J. Solove offers acomprehensive overviewofthe difficulties involvedindiscussions ofprivacy and ultimately providesaprovocative resolu- tion. Heargues […]

Future of Privacy Forum ■ 919 18 th Street, NW, Suite 901 ■ Washington, DC 20006 www.futureofprivacy.org April 20, 2015 National Telecommunications and Information Administration U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Room 4725 Washington, DC 20230 Re: UAS RFC 2015 Dear Mr. Verdi: The Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) is a think tank […]

Draft June 16 , 2011 Forthcoming 114 West Virginia Law R eview * Assistant Professor, University of Louisville, Louis D. Brandeis School of Law; J.D., University of Michigan. The author extends thanks to the many scholars who helped with this piece. The author cannot overstate her appreciation for Nancy Levit ‘s review of earlier drafts. […]

[…] –  conspicuousl y  and  clearly.    The  FIP  of  choice  deals with visitor control over the collection, use and dissemination of  their PII. 71  This discussion must  include  a  discussion  of  control  over  PII  utilized  in  a  manner  different   then  promised  upon  collection.   Describing choice-related privacy provisions is important bec ause visitors are less likely to perceive PII  •  identification of the uses to which the data will b e put [Choice];   •  identification of any potential recipients of the d ata [Choice];   •  the  nature  of  the  data  collected  and  the  means  by  w hich  it  is  collected  […]

[…] public health law. While an examination of this topic is bey ond the scope of this Article, we can simply observe that, fortunately, a broad, multi – pronged public policy effort is now being directed toward this public policy issue. The highest profile participant in the debate is First Lady Michelle Obama, who is […]

Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1862264 L EGAL S TUDIES R ESEARCH P APER S ERIES PAPER N O. 1 1-0 6-0 6 June 2011 T HE L IMITS OF T ORT PRIVACY by Neil M. Richards Professor of Law Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1862264Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1862264 DO NOT DELETE 6/20/2011 3:35 PM 357 […]

[…] Brotherhood could pull it off . But in classified briefings, the Director of National Intelligence told President Booker that he thought the threat was extremely real. Omar’s promised “surp rise” was likely some kind of biological attack. Some attacks might fail. But others could work. The overall damage to life and to the economy […]

[…] established contexts. Consider facial – recognition technology and social media. When uploading photos to social network sites or sharing sites like Facebook and Flikr, users are often promised that the website will respect both the user‘s privacy and their privacy settings. 186 An important function of some of these websites is the ability to […]