Search results

[…] to the collection and processing of PI in China, including in the Cybersecurity Law and Civil Code, which are mainly centered on consent. This evolution will be welcomed by practitioners and legal scholars alike, who in China as elsewhere criticized overly relying on consent as an insufficient and artificial protection of the individual. The […]

[…] economic, and professional opportunities. If regulation is to be effective, it should focus on both technical details and the underlying values and rights that must be protected from adverse uses of AI, to ensure that AI is ultimately used to promote human dignity and welfare. A .pdf version of the printed paper is available here.

[…] to unauthorized individuals. Security best practices require that authentication be accomplished via a multi-factor system, requiring two of the three options: something you know (password or pin code, security question), something you have (a smart card, specific mobile device, or USB token), or something you are (a biometric).  Once an ID holder is authenticated, […]

[…] trend to modernize their regulatory approach, several of them proposing sandboxes (e.g., the CNIL and the Norwegian DPA), and pushing for more self-regulation, like the adoption of Codes of Conduct. DPAs also plan on dedicating efforts to make GDPR compliance work in practice on a large scale by targeting the empowerment of DPOs and […]

[…] Over time, many of its legislative efforts have been very influential and become law in the United States — for instance, the ULC drafted the Uniform Commercial Code in 1952. More recently, the ULC drafted the Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act (2014-15), which has been adopted in at least 46 states. The […]

[…] Using a researcher-friendly version of Empatica’s E4 device that prevents the collection of geolocation data, IP address, or mobile International Mobile Equipment Identity (IMEI) identifiers. Using QR codes to link participants to specific wearable devices to ensure that participant names and study record IDs would not be shared. Learn more about the project, including […]

[…] all plans, processes, and frameworks throughout the research collaboration. Use Technology to Enhance Privacy. The Stanford research team and Empatica took advantage of technology, where possible, to promote privacy throughout the project. Stanford employed QR codes to prevent the need to share participant identifiers, including names and study record IDs, with Empatica. Use Privacy-Protective […]

[…] health information. Using a researcher-friendly device, Empatica’s E4, that prevents the collection of geolocation data, IP address, or mobile International Mobile Equipment Identity (IMEI) identifiers. Using QR codes to link participants to specific wearable devices to ensure that participant names and study record IDs would not be shared. “A large part of our job […]

[…] goal is to balance consumer privacy interests against concerns about practical business compliance. Further research might include, for example, a review of Congressional histories, or learning from other, non-privacy federal laws. We welcome feedback on the Discussion Draft. Read the next blog in this series: Navigating Preemption through the Lens of Existing State Privacy Laws.