Search results

[…] that “1,327 ed-tech tools were accessed on average each month after the coronavirus-related closures. That’s a nearly 90 percent increase over the previous monthly average for the 2018–2019 academic year, when just 703, were accessed.” As part of a robust data governance program, schools and districts should have a process in place to vet […]

[…] becoming a baseline for reasonable conduct regardless of whether a jurisdiction has passed AI-specific legislation. The Growth of AI Laws Utilizing Voluntary Standards Colorado’s AI Act (SB 205), prior to the revised policy framework, was the first in the U.S. to require deployers to implement a “risk management policy and program” that aligns with […]

[…] that stakeholders should continue to track: Federal — S 146 (TAKE IT DOWN Act regarding nonconsensual intimate imagery): notice-and-removal requirements effective May 19, 2026. Colorado — SB 205 (Colorado AI Act): effective June 30, 2026. Connecticut — SB 1295 (amendments to the Connecticut Data Privacy Act regarding automated decision making): effective July 1, 2026. […]

[…] itself).   A core challenge of the EO is the question of what, exactly, qualifies as an “AI law.” While standalone statutes such as Colorado’s AI Act (SB 205) are explicit targets of the EO’s efforts, many state measures are not written as AI-specific laws at all. Instead they are embedded within broader privacy, safety, […]

[…] Trends, November 2024, papers.ssrn.com/abstract_id=5309115. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS All FPF materials that are released publicly are free to share and adapt with appropriate attribution. Learn more . B etween June 2018 and June 2024, nineteen U.S. states enacted comprehensive consumer privacy laws that are technology neutral, broadly applicable, and non- sectoral. This rapid adoption of privacy legislation […]

[…] – Regulation of unfair and deceptive acts and practices in connection with collection and use of personal information from and about children on the Internet Sec . 201 . (a) A CTS PROHIBITED ONLINE COLLECTION , USE , DISCLOSURE , AND DELETION OF PERSONAL INFORMATION OF CHILDREN AND TEENS . (1) IN GENERAL . […]

[…] the meaning of “comparable set of Processing operations” and providing an example of it). 38 See “Unfairness By Algorithm: Distilling The Harms Of Automated Decision-Making,” FPF (Dec. 2017), https://fpf.org/wp-content/ uploads/2017/12/FPF-Automated-Decision-Making-Harms-and-Mitigation-Charts.pdf (providing a sample taxonomy of harms related to automated decision-making and suggested mitigations). 39 “Evaluation and monitoring metrics for generative AI,” Microsoft (Nov. 19, […]

[…] the meaning of “comparable set of Processing operations” and providing an example of it). 38 See “Unfairness By Algorithm: Distilling The Harms Of Automated Decision-Making,” FPF (Dec. 2017), https://fpf.org/wp-content/ uploads/2017/12/FPF-Automated-Decision-Making-Harms-and-Mitigation-Charts.pdf (providing a sample taxonomy of harms related to automated decision-making and suggested mitigations). 39 “Evaluation and monitoring metrics for generative AI,” Microsoft (Nov. 19, […]

[…] the meaning of “comparable set of Processing operations” and providing an example of it). 38 See “Unfairness By Algorithm: Distilling The Harms Of Automated Decision-Making,” FPF (Dec. 2017), https://fpf.org/wp-content/ uploads/2017/12/FPF-Automated-Decision-Making-Harms-and-Mitigation-Charts.pdf (providing a sample taxonomy of harms related to automated decision-making and suggested mitigations). 39 “Evaluation and monitoring metrics for generative AI,” Microsoft (Nov. 19, […]

[…] be included within a contract between the service provider and the regulated entity. Enforcement New York provides for enforcement by the New York Attorney General . § 1127(1). • The NY AG’s office may enjoin any violation and may seek restitution, disgorgement of profits directly or indirectly obtained, civil penalties of up to $15,000 […]