Search results

[…] and accompanying text. 67. Reath, supra note 57, at 350-51. 68. Id. at 351. 69. Singer, Duties and Duties to Oneself supra note 48, at 141. 2013] 857 HeinOnline — 64 Ala. L. Rev. 857 2012-2013 Alabama Law Review duty to P. But to say that P has a duty to P is also […]

[…] to the revolution caused by the Ford Model T, Johns Hopkins’ Sean Fahey declared that Big Data was important because it had “democratized” data. Today, thanks to cheap storage, excess computational power, and open source initiatives, enterprises of any scale can work with large amounts of data, eliminating the specialized equipment and significant capital […]

[…] an$ advisory$ board$ comprised$ of$ leaders$ from$industry,$academia,$law$and$advocacy$groups.$!! !!!!!!Overextended:! Jurisdiction! and! Applicable! Law! under! the!EU! General! Data! Protection!Regulation!!The! proposed! EU!General!Data! Protection!Regulation!(“GDPR”)1!re9defines!EU! privacy!jurisdiction!and! applicable! law.!Article! 3(1)! of! the! GDPR,!which! deals! with! the! authority! to!regulate! a! controller! or! processor! located!within! the! European! Union!and!addresses!locally9based!actors,!is!uncontroversial!in!its!assertion!of!authority.!The!introduction!of!a!new!”one9stop9shop”! concept,! with! a! primary! regulator,!to!augment! this! “country! of! origin”9based!approach!should!help!provide!legal!certainty!for!organizations!operating!in!Europe.!!!Article! 3(2)! of! the! GDPR! extends! […]

[…] an$ advisory$ board$ comprised$ of$ leaders$ from$industry,$academia,$law$and$advocacy$groups.$!! !!!!!!Overextended:! Jurisdiction! and! Applicable! Law! under! the!EU! General! Data! Protection!Regulation!!The! proposed! EU!General!Data! Protection!Regulation!(“GDPR”)1!re9defines!EU! privacy!jurisdiction!and! applicable! law.!Article! 3(1)! of! the! GDPR,!which! deals! with! the! authority! to!regulate! a! controller! or! processor! located!within! the! European! Union!and!addresses!locally9based!actors,!is!uncontroversial!in!its!assertion!of!authority.!The!introduction!of!a!new!”one9stop9shop”! concept,! with! a! primary! regulator,!to!augment! this! “country! of! origin”9based!approach!should!help!provide!legal!certainty!for!organizations!operating!in!Europe.!!!Article! 3(2)! of! the! GDPR! extends! […]

[…] an$ advisory$ board$ comprised$ of$ leaders$ from$industry,$academia,$law$and$advocacy$groups.$!! !!!!!!Overextended:! Jurisdiction! and! Applicable! Law! under! the!EU! General! Data! Protection!Regulation!!The! proposed! EU!General!Data! Protection!Regulation!(“GDPR”)1!re9defines!EU! privacy!jurisdiction!and! applicable! law.!Article! 3(1)! of! the! GDPR,!which! deals! with! the! authority! to!regulate! a! controller! or! processor! located!within! the! European! Union!and!addresses!locally9based!actors,!is!uncontroversial!in!its!assertion!of!authority.!The!introduction!of!a!new!”one9stop9shop”! concept,! with! a! primary! regulator,!to!augment! this! “country! of! origin”9based!approach!should!help!provide!legal!certainty!for!organizations!operating!in!Europe.!!!Article! 3(2)! of! the! GDPR! extends! […]

[…] an$ advisory$ board$ comprised$ of$ leaders$ from$industry,$academia,$law$and$advocacy$groups.$!! !!!!!!Overextended:! Jurisdiction! and! Applicable! Law! under! the!EU! General! Data! Protection!Regulation!!The! proposed! EU!General!Data! Protection!Regulation!(“GDPR”)1!re9defines!EU! privacy!jurisdiction!and! applicable! law.!Article! 3(1)! of! the! GDPR,!which! deals! with! the! authority! to!regulate! a! controller! or! processor! located!within! the! European! Union!and!addresses!locally9based!actors,!is!uncontroversial!in!its!assertion!of!authority.!The!introduction!of!a!new!”one9stop9shop”! concept,! with! a! primary! regulator,!to!augment! this! “country! of! origin”9based!approach!should!help!provide!legal!certainty!for!organizations!operating!in!Europe.!!!Article! 3(2)! of! the! GDPR! extends! […]

[…] is! a! temporary!state!rather! than! a!stable!category.97!In!an!influential!law!review!article,!Paul!Ohm!observed!that!”[r]eHidentification!science! disrupts! the! privacy! policy! landscape! by! undermining! the! faith! that! we! have! placed! in!anonymization.”98!The! implications! for! government! and! businesses! can! be! stark,!since!deH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!93!This!article! deals!with!the!adjustment!of!the!existing!privacy!framework!to!accommodate!big!data!realities.!Other!privacy!issues!raised!by!big!data,!such!as!government!access!to!or!surveillance!of!private!sector!databases,!are!beyond!the!scope!of!this!paper.!See,!e.g.,!James!Dempsey!&!Lara!Flint,!Commercial!Data!and!National!Security,!72!GEO.!WASH.!L.!REV.!1459!(2004).!!!94!See,!e.g.,!Article!29!Data!Protection!Working!Party,!Opinion!4/2007!on!the!Concept!of!Personal!Data,!WP!136,!June!20,!2007,!http://ec.europa.eu/justice/policies/privacy/docs/wpdocs/2007/wp136_en.pdf;!Markle!Foundation!Task!Force!on!National!Security!in!the!Information!Age,!Creating!a!Trusted!Network!for!Homeland!Security!(2003),!http://www.markle.org/downloadable_assets/nstf_report2_full_report.pdf;!Ira!Rubinstein,!Ronald!Lee!&!Paul!Schwartz,!Data!Mining!and!Internet!Profiling:!Emerging!Regulatory!and!Technological!Approaches,!75!U.!CHI.!L.!REV.!261,!268H29!(2008).!!95!W.!Kuan!Hon,!Christopher!Millard!&!Ian!Walden,!The!Problem!of!’Personal!Data’!in!Cloud!Computing!H!What!Information!is!Regulated?!The!Cloud!of!Unknowing,!Part!1,!March!15,!2011,!Queen!Mary!School!of!Law!Legal!Studies!Research!Paper!No.!75/2011,!http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1783577.!!96!This!line!of!research!was!pioneered!by!Latanya!Sweeney!and!made!accessible!to!lawyers!by!Paul!Ohm.!Ohm,!supra!note!64;!Latanya!Sweeney,!Uniqueness!of!Simple!Demographics!in!the!U.S.!Population,!Laboratory!for!International!Data!Privacy!Working!Paper,!LIDAPHWP4!(2000);!Narayanan!&!Shmatikov,!supra!note!62;!Arvind!Narayanan!&!Vitaly!Shmatikov,!Myths!and!Fallacies!of!”Personally!Identifiable!Information”,!53(6)!COMMUNICATIONS!OF!THE!ACM!24!(2010),!http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/shmat/shmat_cacm10.pdf;!and!more!recently!Arvind!Narayanan,!Hristo!Paskov!et!al,!On!the!Feasibility!of!InternetHScale!Author!Identification,!IEEE!S&P!2012,!http://randomwalker.info/publications/authorHidentificationHdraft.pdf.!!!97!See!series!of!blog!posts!by!Ed!Felten,!the!FTC’s!Chief!Technologist!and!a!Professor!of!Computer!Science!at!Princeton:!Ed!Felten,!Does!Hashing!Make!Data!”Anonymous”?,!TECH@FTC,!April!22,!2012,!http://techatftc.wordpress.com/2012/04/22/doesHhashingHmakeHdataHanonymous;!Ed!Felten,!Are!pseudonyms!”anonymous”?,!TECH@FTC,!April!30,!2012,!http://techatftc.wordpress.com/2012/04/30/areHpseudonymsHanonymous;!Felten,!supra!note!61.!!98!Ohm,!supra!note!64,!at!1704.!!! !!20!identification! has! become! a! key! component! of! numerous! business! models,!most! notably! in! the!context!of!health!data!(e.g.,!clinical!trials),!online!behavioral!advertising,!and!cloud!computing.!!The! first! major! policy! question! raised! by! the! big! data! phenomenon! concerns! the! scope! […]

[…] is! a! temporary!state!rather! than! a!stable!category.97!In!an!influential!law!review!article,!Paul!Ohm!observed!that!”[r]eHidentification!science! disrupts! the! privacy! policy! landscape! by! undermining! the! faith! that! we! have! placed! in!anonymization.”98!The! implications! for! government! and! businesses! can! be! stark,!since!deH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!93!This!article! deals!with!the!adjustment!of!the!existing!privacy!framework!to!accommodate!big!data!realities.!Other!privacy!issues!raised!by!big!data,!such!as!government!access!to!or!surveillance!of!private!sector!databases,!are!beyond!the!scope!of!this!paper.!See,!e.g.,!James!Dempsey!&!Lara!Flint,!Commercial!Data!and!National!Security,!72!GEO.!WASH.!L.!REV.!1459!(2004).!!!94!See,!e.g.,!Article!29!Data!Protection!Working!Party,!Opinion!4/2007!on!the!Concept!of!Personal!Data,!WP!136,!June!20,!2007,!http://ec.europa.eu/justice/policies/privacy/docs/wpdocs/2007/wp136_en.pdf;!Markle!Foundation!Task!Force!on!National!Security!in!the!Information!Age,!Creating!a!Trusted!Network!for!Homeland!Security!(2003),!http://www.markle.org/downloadable_assets/nstf_report2_full_report.pdf;!Ira!Rubinstein,!Ronald!Lee!&!Paul!Schwartz,!Data!Mining!and!Internet!Profiling:!Emerging!Regulatory!and!Technological!Approaches,!75!U.!CHI.!L.!REV.!261,!268H29!(2008).!!95!W.!Kuan!Hon,!Christopher!Millard!&!Ian!Walden,!The!Problem!of!’Personal!Data’!in!Cloud!Computing!H!What!Information!is!Regulated?!The!Cloud!of!Unknowing,!Part!1,!March!15,!2011,!Queen!Mary!School!of!Law!Legal!Studies!Research!Paper!No.!75/2011,!http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1783577.!!96!This!line!of!research!was!pioneered!by!Latanya!Sweeney!and!made!accessible!to!lawyers!by!Paul!Ohm.!Ohm,!supra!note!64;!Latanya!Sweeney,!Uniqueness!of!Simple!Demographics!in!the!U.S.!Population,!Laboratory!for!International!Data!Privacy!Working!Paper,!LIDAPHWP4!(2000);!Narayanan!&!Shmatikov,!supra!note!62;!Arvind!Narayanan!&!Vitaly!Shmatikov,!Myths!and!Fallacies!of!”Personally!Identifiable!Information”,!53(6)!COMMUNICATIONS!OF!THE!ACM!24!(2010),!http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/shmat/shmat_cacm10.pdf;!and!more!recently!Arvind!Narayanan,!Hristo!Paskov!et!al,!On!the!Feasibility!of!InternetHScale!Author!Identification,!IEEE!S&P!2012,!http://randomwalker.info/publications/authorHidentificationHdraft.pdf.!!!97!See!series!of!blog!posts!by!Ed!Felten,!the!FTC’s!Chief!Technologist!and!a!Professor!of!Computer!Science!at!Princeton:!Ed!Felten,!Does!Hashing!Make!Data!”Anonymous”?,!TECH@FTC,!April!22,!2012,!http://techatftc.wordpress.com/2012/04/22/doesHhashingHmakeHdataHanonymous;!Ed!Felten,!Are!pseudonyms!”anonymous”?,!TECH@FTC,!April!30,!2012,!http://techatftc.wordpress.com/2012/04/30/areHpseudonymsHanonymous;!Felten,!supra!note!61.!!98!Ohm,!supra!note!64,!at!1704.!!! !!20!identification! has! become! a! key! component! of! numerous! business! models,!most! notably! in! the!context!of!health!data!(e.g.,!clinical!trials),!online!behavioral!advertising,!and!cloud!computing.!!The! first! major! policy! question! raised! by! the! big! data! phenomenon! concerns! the! scope! […]

[…] discussions: A Brief FPF Survey of Mobile Application Best Practices The August 22, 2012 multistakeholder meeting will be the second in a series of NTIA-convened discussions concerning mobile application transparency. Webcast: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/other-publication/2012/privacy-multistakeholder-meeting-webcast-8-22-2012 Moderated Conference Bridge: dial-in – ( 888–957–9870 or 210-839-8914) passcode – PRIVACY MSH For more details about the upcoming meeting visit the NTIA website.

[…] of” its” brand” might” make” a” different” choice”–”perhaps”not”movie”rental”companies,”thanks”to”the” VPPA,” but”certain” types” of”noncommercial” video” sites”might.” Platforms” might” presumptively” share”virtually” any” other” category” of” information:”books,” web” sites,” music,”location,” restaurant” reservations,”purchases,”and”on”and”on.”At”the”other”hypothetical”extreme,”we”could”make”it”so”difficult”to”transmit”information”that”no”sharing”occurs.”I”don’t”know”of”anyone”who”supports”this”option.”The”benefits”explored”in”Part”II”make”it”clear” that” we” would” lose” a” great” deal”if” we” strangled” playlist” sharing”or” obstructed” individuals” from”posting”links”to”recommended”content.””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””””96″The”NetflixEsupported”bill”to”change”the”VPPA”specifies”that”consumers”may””withdraw”their”consent.””H.R.”2471″(Dec.”7,”2011).”But”the”bill”does”not”require”that”companies”such”as”Netflix”offer”a”caseEbyEcase”optEout,”and”it”does”not”ensure”that”cancelling”the”authorization”is”reasonably”easy.”See”McGeveran”Testimony,”supra”note”30.”97″Leslie”Meredith,”Senators*Consider*Banning*Automatic*Media*Sharing*on*Facebook,”SCI”AMERICAN”(Feb.”12,”2012),”http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=senatorsEconsiderEbanning”(“Nagging”requests”for”permission”could”overwhelm”Facebook”if”the”Senate”decides”all”media”should”be”governed””by”the”VPPA);”TK”CITE”Chris”Wolf”testimony.”98″In”theory”the”nature”of”the”movie”choices”could”be”so”private”that”it”would”violate”the”public”disclosure”of”private”facts”tort.”It”is”difficult”to”imagine”disclosures”of”media”choices”sufficiently””outrageous””to”trigger”liability.”TK”CITE”Restatement.”Moreover,”the”publication”requirement”in”some”jurisdictions”might”prevent”the”application”of”the”tort”to”limited”publications”among”Facebook”friends.”CITE”cases,”Strahilevitz”article.””99″McGeveran,”supra”note”13,”at”1139E40.” 23″DRAFT&–&DO&NOT&QUOTE&OR&CITE&WITHOUT&PERMISSION&If”there”should”not”be”either”zero”friction”or”extreme”friction,”then”our”task”is”setting”the”degree”in” between” those” two” poles.” With” perfect” information” I” suspect” we” could” […]