Search results

PRIVACY PAPERS FOR POLICYMAKERS 2016 Privacy Papers for Policymakers is supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1654085. Privacy Papers for Policymakers 2016 1 January 11th, 2017 We are pleased to introduce FPF’s seventh annual Privacy Papers for Policymakers. Each year, we invite privacy scholars and authors with an interest in […]

Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation or the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation or i ts trustees, officers, or staff . B EYOND IRB S: D ESIGNING E THICAL R EVIEW P ROCESSES FOR […]

The winners of the 2017 PPPM Award are: Law Enforcement Access to Data Across Borders: The Evolving Security and Human Rights Issues; Accountable Algorithms; The Privacy Policymaking of State Attorneys General; Privacy of Public Data; and Privacy and Data Security Harms. The Finalist Judges also selected four papers for Honorable Mention on the basis of their uniformly strong reviews from the Advisory Board.

Privacy Papers for Policy Makers 2012 Cover The publication of “Privacy Papers for Policy Makers” was supported by AT&T, Microsoft, and GMAC. Inside front cover November 7, 2012 We are delighted to provide you with FPF ’s third annual “Privacy Papers for Policy Makers,” representing cutting-edge research and analysis on a variety of important privacy […]

A staff member from DJI Technology Co. demonstrates a drone in Shenzhen, in southern China’s Guangdong province. A new website lets people request that drones stay away from their property.

Privacy above all other Fundamental Rights? Challenges with the Implementation of a Right to be Forgotten in Canada* Eloïse Gratton** and Jules Polonetsky* ** Executive Summary This paper explores whether importing a “right to be forgotten” (RTBF) that would allow individuals to stop data search engines or other third parties, from providing links to information […]

December 18, 2015 1 US Surveillance Law, Safe Harbor, and Reforms Since 2013 Peter Swire1 Executive Summary: This White Paper is a submission to the Belgian Privacy Authority for its December 18, 2015 Forum on “The Consequences of the Judgment in the Schrems Case.”2 The Forum discusses the decision by the European Court of Justice […]

December’17,’2015”1’US#Surveillance#Law,#Safe#Harbor,#and#Reforms#Since#2013##Peter#Swire1##Executive#Summary:#’This’ White’ Paper’ is’ a’ submission’ to’ the’ Belgian’ Privacy’ Authority’ for’ its’December’ 18,’ 2015′ Forum’ on’ “The’ Consequences’ of’ the’ Judgment’ in’ the’Schrems’Case.”2”The’ Forum’ discusses’ the’ decision’ by’ the’ European’ Court’ of’ Justice’ in’Schrems(v.(Data(Protection(Commissioner3’that’ the’ EU/US’ Safe’ Harbor’ was’ unlawful’under’ the’ EU’ Data’ Protection’ Directive,’ particularly’ due’ to’ concerns’ about’ US’surveillance’law.”For’the’Forum,’I’have’been’asked’to’comment’on’two’issues:”’1)Is’ US’ surveillance’ law’ […]

DISCUSSION DOCUMENT DECEMBER 2015 PRIVACY PRINCIPLES FOR FACIAL RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY SUMMARY Facial recognition technology once seemed like something out of the movies, but it is increasingly being incorporated into our everyday lives. Both public and private sector organizations are incorporating facial recognition into products and services to create substantial benefits for consumers. For example, companies […]

IT’S NOT HOW MUCH DATA YOU HAVE, BUT HOW YOU USE IT: A ssessing P RIVACY IN THE C ONTEXT OF C ONSUMER D ATA INTEGR ATION Jules Polonetsky and Omer Tene Future of Privacy Forum FONT IS BANK GOTHIC 1 Jules Polonetsky and Omer Tene, Future of Privacy Forum ∗ This paper addresses how […]