Search results

Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation or the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation or i ts trustees, officers, or staff . B EYOND IRB S: D ESIGNING E THICAL R EVIEW P ROCESSES FOR […]

The Anonymisation Decision -making Fram e work E l a i n e M a c k e y , M a r k E l l i o t , K i e r o n O ’ H a r a 1. Intro ductio n The need for well -thought -out anonymisation has […]

Privacy above all other Fundamental Rights? Challenges with the Implementation of a Right to be Forgotten in Canada* Eloïse Gratton** and Jules Polonetsky* ** Executive Summary This paper explores whether importing a “right to be forgotten” (RTBF) that would allow individuals to stop data search engines or other third parties, from providing links to information […]

October 15, 2014 via email : [email protected] Ms. Diane Honeycutt Secretary Computer Security Division National Institute of Standards and Technology 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8930 Gaithersburg, MD 20899 Re: Public Comments, NIST Privacy Engineering Workshop Dear Ms. Honeycutt: The Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) is a think tank seeking to advance responsible data practices and […]

Benefit-Risk Analysis for Big Data Projects Jules Polonetsky Omer Tene Joseph Jerome Benefit-Risk Analysis for Big Data Projects Jules Polonetsky Omer Tene Joseph Jerome September 201b About the Future of Privacy Forum Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) is a Washington, DC based think tank that seeks to advance responsible data practices. The forum is led […]

Future of Privacy Forum  919 18 th Street, NW, Suite 9 01  Washington, DC 20006 www.futureofprivacy.org August 5, 2014 Via e -mail: [email protected] National Telecommunications and Information Administration U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Avenue N.W., Room 4725 Washington, DC 20230 Re: Privacy RFC 2014 The Future of Priv acy Forum (FPF) is […]

1 Future of Privacy Forum 919 18 th Street, NW, Suite 901 Washington, DC 20006 www.futureofprivacy.org Statement of Jules Polonetsky Executive Director, Future of Privacy Forum Written Testimony Before the California State Assembly Joint Committee Hearing on Ensuring Student Privacy in the Digital Age May 14, 2014 The Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) i s […]

i PREFACE FROM THE CO -CHAIRS OF THE FUTURE OF PRIVACY FORUM As the Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) celebrates its fifth anniversary, we welcome the opportunity to participate in the discussions over trans -Atlantic privacy and, in particular, the effec tiveness and utility of the EU -US Safe Harbor. For five years, FPF has […]

  THE  PURSUIT OF  PRIVACY    IN A  W ORLD  W HERE  INFORMATION    C ONTROL  IS FAILING     ADAM  THIERER *  INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………..410 I. NORMATIVE  CONSIDERATIONS :  T HE  CHALLENGE OF  DEFINING  PRIVACY …………414 A. Privacy and “the Pursuit of   Happiness” ……………………………………………..414 B. On the Problem of “Creepiness”   as the Standard of Privacy Harm …………….417 C. Increasing Tensions Between   Privacy Rights and Online Free Speech …..421 II. ENFORCEMENT  COMPLICATIONS :   C ONTROLLING  INFORMATION  FLOWS ……………..424 A. Media and Technological Convergence […]

2013 ] 1055 A FRAMEWORK FOR BENE FIT -COST ANALYSIS IN DIGITAL PRIVACY D EBATES Adam Thierer * INTRODUCTION Policy debates surrounding online child safety and digital privacy share much in common . Both are complicated by thorny definitional di s- putes and highly subjective valuations of “harm.” Both issues can be su b- ject […]