Search results

Why the Right to Data Portability Likely Reduces Consumer Welfare: Antitrust and Privacy Critique Peter Swire & Yianni Lagos Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper Series No. 204 May 31, 2013 This working paper series is co-sponsored by the Center for Interdisciplinary Law and Policy Studies at the Moritz College of Law This paper […]

(1623) ARTICLE INFORMATION PRIVACY IN THE CLOUD PAUL M. SCHWARTZ † INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………………. 1624 I. T HE USE OF THE CLOUD ……………………………………………….. 1626 A. International Processing of Personal Data……………………………….. 1628 B. Networked Data Processes …………………………………………………. 1630 C. Modular Units and Outsourced Services ………………………………… 1632 II. T HE M ISMATCH WITH INFORMATION PRIVACY LAW ………….. 1634 […]

  1966 THE EU-U.S. PRIVACY COLLISION: A TURN TO INSTITUTIONS AND PROCEDURES Pa u l M . S c h w a r t z ∗ I.  INTRODUCTION   Internet scholarship in the United States generally concentrates on  how decisions made in this country about copyright law, network neu- trality, and other policy areas shape cyberspace. 1  In one important as- pect of the evolving Internet, however, a comparative focus is indis- pensable.  Legal forces outside the United States have significantly  shaped the governance of information privacy, a highly important as- pect of cyberspace, and one involving central issues of civil liberties.   The EU has played a major role in international decisions involving  information privacy, a role that has been bolstered by the authority of  EU member states to block data transfers to third party nations, in- cluding the United States. 2  The European Commission’s release in late January 2012 of its  proposed “General Data Protection Regulation” (the Proposed Regula- tion) provides a perfect juncture to assess the ongoing EU-U.S. privacy  collision. 3  An intense debate is now occurring about critical areas of  information policy, including the rules for lawfulness of personal pro- cessing, the “right to be forgotten,” and the conditions for data flows  between the EU and the United States.  This Article begins by tracing the rise of the current EU-U.S. pri- vacy status quo.  The European Commission’s 1995 Data Protection  Directive (the Directive) staked out a number of bold positions, includ- ing a limit on international data transfers to countries that lacked “ad- equate” legal protections for personal information. 4  The impact of the  […]

Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2042638 Illinois Program in Law, Behavior and Social Science Research Paper No. LBSS12 -11 Illinois Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 11 -20 Information Privacy and Data Control in Cloud Computing : Consumers, Privacy Preferences and Market Efficiency Jay P. Kesan * Carol M. Hayes** Masooda N. Bashir*** *Professor, […]

V olume 52 | N umbe r 4 Ar ticle 3 12-14-2012 , d glanc y@s cu .e du F ollo w thi s and a ddition al w orks at: h tt p://d ig it alc ommon s.l aw .s c u .e du/l aw re v ie w Thi s Symposium i s […]

WORKING DRAFT (Do Not Cite or Distribute without Authors’Permission ) Forthcoming, August, 2013, George Washington Law Review August 2013 Vol. 81 No. 5 101 Privacy in Europe: Initial Data on Governance Choices and Corporate Practices Kenneth A. Bamberger * & Deirdre K. Mulligan ** A BSTRACT As this article goes to press, the European Union […]

+ 2(,1 1/,1( Citation: 81 Fordham L. Rev. 1187 2012-2013 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Sat Jun 22 16:16:19 2013 — Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline’s Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License — The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. […]

Dennis Hirsch

Susan Friewald and Sylvain Métille

Robert Sprague