Showing results for virg xped promised estine
Dispelling the Myths Surrounding De-identification Anonymization Remains a Strong Tool for Protecting Privacy
Dispelling the Myths Surrounding De-identification: Anonymization Remains a Strong Tool for Protecting Privacy Ann Cavoukian, Ph.D. Information & Privacy Commissioner, Ontario, Canada June 2011 Khaled El Emam, Ph.D. Canada Research Chair in Electronic Health Information, CHEO Research Institute and University of Ottawa Table of Contents Introduction ……………………………………………………………… ………. 1 Questioning the Value of De-identification ………………………………. […]
Cookies_Constitution_and_Common-Law_2
[…] L.Ed.2d 456 (1967)(Fortas, J., dissenting). See also Zacchini v. Scripps -Howard Broadcasting Co., 433 U.S. 562, 97 S.Ct. 2849, 53 L.Ed.2d 965 (1977); Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555, 579, 100 S.Ct. DRAFT – PUBLISHED IN WINTER 2002 -2003 3 The U.S. Constitution provides the framework for a common law right to […]
Chinas_Pragmatic_Privacy_Law_beyond_APEC
China’s Pragmatic Privacy Law beyond APEC: Does Generational Culture Matter? By Cheryl L. Brown Associate Professor Department of Political Science University of North Carolina at Charlotte [email protected] Paper Draft 1 Please do not quote without permission Abstract Culture and tradition remain significant influences in China’s conception of privacy and implementation of data protection laws. At the sam e time, the National People’s Congress’ initiation of privacy protection consider ation reveals the prospect of evolving laws emphasizing protection of data privacy based o n domestic and international developments. Although a growing literature focuse s on Internet filtering and social networking mining, this paper will examine five fac tors influencing national and international perspectives of China’s approach to p rivacy and data protection: (1) privacy concerns of RFID technology of China’s second-gener ation national identification card (2) personal data leaks of consumer information by banks, insurance companies, and real estate companies as China seeks to build consumer t rust in the modern banking and financial system; (3) data protection for citizens of countries engaged with China across borders in electronic commerce and outsourcing; (4) privacy compatibility with multinational and regional organizations in a soft power era; and (5) the changing leadership generations with backgrounds in the “sof t sciences” of history, economics, management, business, journalism, and law. These f actors may offer useful comparisons for addressing the convergence of an international framework for privacy laws and data protection. 1 This paper draft was originally submitted to the I nformation Privacy Law Scholars Conference, June 2010. The author is currently revising the paper. 2 […]
China’s_Pragmatic_Privacy_Law_beyond_APEC_
China’s Pragmatic Privacy Law beyond APEC: Does Generational Culture Matter? By Cheryl L. Brown Associate Professor Department of Political Science University of North Carolina at Charlotte [email protected] Paper Draft 1 Please do not quote without permission Abstract Culture and tradition remain significant influences in China’s conception of privacy and implementation of data protection laws. At the sam e time, the National People’s Congress’ initiation of privacy protection consider ation reveals the prospect of evolving laws emphasizing protection of data privacy based o n domestic and international developments. Although a growing literature focuse s on Internet filtering and social networking mining, this paper will examine five fac tors influencing national and international perspectives of China’s approach to p rivacy and data protection: (1) privacy concerns of RFID technology of China’s second-gener ation national identification card (2) personal data leaks of consumer information by banks, insurance companies, and real estate companies as China seeks to build consumer t rust in the modern banking and financial system; (3) data protection for citizens of countries engaged with China across borders in electronic commerce and outsourcing; (4) privacy compatibility with multinational and regional organizations in a soft power era; and (5) the changing leadership generations with backgrounds in the “sof t sciences” of history, economics, management, business, journalism, and law. These f actors may offer useful comparisons for addressing the convergence of an international framework for privacy laws and data protection. 1 This paper draft was originally submitted to the I nformation Privacy Law Scholars Conference, June 2010. The author is currently revising the paper. 2 […]
Chattering Laptops
Chattering Laptops Tuomas Aura 1 , Janne Lindqvist 2 , Michael Roe 1 , Anish Mohammed 3 1 Microsoft Research, Cambridge, UK 2 Helsinki University of Technology, Finland 3 Royal Holloway, University of London, UK Abstract. Mobile computer users often have a false sense of anonymity when they connect to the Internet at cafes, hotels, […]
Calo_Boundaries_of_Privacy_Harm
[…] furnishing an email constitutes “consideration.” See, e.g., C AL PEN . CODE § 319 (“A lottery is any scheme for the disposal or distribution of property by chance, among persons who have paid or promised to pay any valuable consideration for the chance of obtaining such property or a portion of it …”). 105 See Fred Cate, The Failure of Fair Information Practice Principles […]
Accountability as the Basis for Regulating Privacy Can Information Security Regulations Inform Privacy Policy
[…] violation of Google’s Gmail privacy policy and the Safe Harbor agreement. T he FTC als o argued that the privacy controls Google implemented did not work as promised. FTC alleged that Google had engaged in an unfair or deceptive trade practice, in violation of section 5(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act. The settlement […]
Preserving_Identities_ Protecting_Personal_Identifying_Information
[…] (LexisNexis 2007); Utah, U TAH CODE ANN . § 13-44-202 (LexisNexis 2008); Vermont, V T. S TAT . A NN . tit. 9, § 2435 (LexisNexis 2007); Virginia, V A. C ODE ANN . § 18.2-186.6 (LexisNexis 2008); Washington, W ASH . R EV . C ODE ANN . § 19.255.010 (LexisNexis 2008); West […]
Hirsch-King-Big-Data-Sustainability-Draft-Submission.2-1
Word Count: ____ Big Da ta Sustainability An Environmental Management Systems Analogy Dennis D. Hirsch * Jonathan H. King ** Introduction It is commonly proclaimed that ” big data is the new oil.” 1 This is true in the sense that data, like oil, constitutes a critical and therefore valuable resource on which our society […]
The_Deidentification_Dilemma
The Deidentification Dilemma: A Legislative and Contractual Proposal Robert Gellman 1 Version 2.4 July 12, 2010 Abstract Deidentification is one method for protecting priva cy while permitting other uses of personal information. However, deidentified dat a is often still capable of being reidentified. The main purpose of this article is to offer a legislative-based contractual solution for the sharing of deidentifie d personal information while providing protections for privacy. The legislative framework allows a data discloser and a data recipient to enter into a volu ntary contract that defines responsibilities and offers remedies to aggrieved i ndividuals. Introduction The goal of protecting the privacy interests of in dividuals often conflicts with ever- increasing demands for use of personal data to achi eve potentially beneficial objectives in public health, law enforcement, national security, anti-te rrorism, fraud prevention, and research in different fields of study. Conflicts over privacy can be reduced, moderated, and balanced in various ways. Deidentification – the removal of identifiers from personal information used or disclosed for purposes unrelated to the purpose for which the information was originally obtained – is one method for protecting privacy while permitting othe r uses of personal information. However, deidentification does not always make it impossible to reidentify individuals. Reidentification is the linkage of deidentified personal information wi th an overt identifier belonging or assigned to any living or dead individual. It is a premise of this article that statistical, encryption, or other mathematical approaches to deidentification that protect privacy will not p rovide solutions that will address every type of […]