Search results

harvard Privacy is one ofthe most important concepts ofour time, yetitis also oneofthe most elusive. Asrapidly changing technology makes information increasingly available, scholars, activists, andpolicymakers have struggled todefine privacy, withmany con- ceding thatthetask isvirtually impossible. In this concise andlucid book, Daniel J. Solove offers acomprehensive overviewofthe difficulties involvedindiscussions ofprivacy and ultimately providesaprovocative resolu- tion. Heargues […]

Future of Privacy Forum ■ 919 18 th Street, NW, Suite 901 ■ Washington, DC 20006 www.futureofprivacy.org April 20, 2015 National Telecommunications and Information Administration U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Room 4725 Washington, DC 20230 Re: UAS RFC 2015 Dear Mr. Verdi: The Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) is a think tank […]

Draft June 16 , 2011 Forthcoming 114 West Virginia Law R eview * Assistant Professor, University of Louisville, Louis D. Brandeis School of Law; J.D., University of Michigan. The author extends thanks to the many scholars who helped with this piece. The author cannot overstate her appreciation for Nancy Levit ‘s review of earlier […]

[…] –  conspicuousl y  and  clearly.    The  FIP  of  choice  deals with visitor control over the collection, use and dissemination of  their PII. 71  This discussion must  include  a  discussion  of  control  over  PII  utilized  in  a  manner  different   then  promised  upon  collection.   Describing choice-related privacy provisions is important bec ause visitors are less likely to perceive PII  •  identification of the uses to which the data will b e put [Choice];   •  identification of any potential recipients of the d ata [Choice];   •  the  nature  of  the  data  collected  and  the  means  by  w hich  it  is  collected  […]

[…] federal, state or local law.” Id. 67 Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, 47 U.S.C. § 551(a)(2)(A) (1984). 68 Id. 69 The number of Comcast customers in Virginia who subscribe to HBO is an example of aggregate data under the Cable Act. 16 protects non- public information as PII might not preclude such combinations. […]

Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1862264 L EGAL S TUDIES R ESEARCH P APER S ERIES PAPER N O. 1 1-0 6-0 6 June 2011 T HE L IMITS OF T ORT PRIVACY by Neil M. Richards Professor of Law Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1862264Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1862264 DO NOT DELETE 6/20/2011 3:35 PM 357 […]

[…] School. His articles have appeared in the Harvard Law Review, Yale Law Journal, Stanford Law Review, Columbia Law Review, University of Chicago Law Review, Michigan Law Review, Virginia Law Review, New York University Law Review, Georgetown Law Journal, Northwestern University Law Review, Texas Law Review, and many other journals. According to the most recent […]

[…] 967 (Ky. 1927); Beaumont v. Brown, 257 N.W.2d 522 (Mich. 1977). 3 See, e.g., Sipple v. Chronicle Publ‘g Co., 201 Ca. Rptr. 665 (Cal. Ct. App. 1984); Virgil v. Time, 527 F.2d 1122 (9th Cir. 1975); Neff v. Time, Inc., 406 F. Supp. 858 (W.D. Pa. 1976). 4 See, e.g., Katz v. United States, […]

Sticky Policies: An Approach for Privacy Management across Multiple Parties Authors: Siani Pearson and Marco Casassa Mont Cloud and Security Research Lab, Long Down Avenue, Stoke Gifford, Bristol. BS34 8QZ. Phone: +44 117 3128438/ 3128794 FAX: +44 1173129250 Email: [email protected] ; marco.casassa- [email protected] Abstract Organisations often have good privacy procedures in place for protection of […]

[…] Network  from  Recalled   Data,  4  Soc  Networks  285,  296  (1982)  (examining social networks generally).     [FN101] . For an explanation of this terminology, see text  accompanying notes 110-11.     [FN102] .  See  The  Oracle  of  Bacon  at  Virginia,  online  at  ht tp://  www.cs.virginia.edu/oracle  (visited  May  16,  2005)  (noting  that  12  percent  of  t he  movie  actor  universe  cannot  be  linked  to  the  rest  of  […]