Search results

[…] that found in privacy and data protection laws, such as the Colorado Privacy Act. E.g., 4 Colo. Code Regs. § 904 -3, Rule 8.02(D) (2023), https://coag. gov/ app/uploads/2023/03/FINAL-CLEAN-2023.03.15-Official-CPA-Rules.pdf (discussing the meaning of “comparable set of Processing operations” and providing an example of it). 38 See “Unfairness By Algorithm: Distilling The Harms Of Automated Decision-Making,” […]

[…] that found in privacy and data protection laws, such as the Colorado Privacy Act. E.g., 4 Colo. Code Regs. § 904 -3, Rule 8.02(D) (2023), https://coag. gov/ app/uploads/2023/03/FINAL-CLEAN-2023.03.15-Official-CPA-Rules.pdf (discussing the meaning of “comparable set of Processing operations” and providing an example of it). 38 See “Unfairness By Algorithm: Distilling The Harms Of Automated Decision-Making,” […]

[…] than the da ta subject. In particular, the organization would have to establish that: »the data is reasonably necessary for one of its functions or activities ( APP 3.1); »the collection of the personal data is by lawful and fair means (APP 3.5); »it is unreasonable or impracticable to collect personal data directly from […]

[…] than the da ta subject. In particular, the organization would have to establish that: »the data is reasonably necessary for one of its functions or activities ( APP 3.1); »the collection of the personal data is by lawful and fair means (APP 3.5); »it is unreasonable or impracticable to collect personal data directly from […]

[…] FPF community who provided invaluable feedback on early drafts of this paper. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS All FPF materials that are released publicly are free to share and adapt with appropriate attribution. Learn more . About Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) The Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) is a non-profit organization that serves as a catalyst for […]

[…] than the da ta subject. In particular, the organization would have to establish that: »the data is reasonably necessary for one of its functions or activities ( APP 3.1); »the collection of the personal data is by lawful and fair means (APP 3.5); »it is unreasonable or impracticable to collect personal data directly from […]

[…] effect and enforcement . The Member States have to identify their Fundamental Rights authorities within three months after the entry into force. (Art. 77(2)) Scope and Definitions appl y, six months after the entry into force. (Art. 113(a)) Provisions on Prohibited AI kick off, six months after the entry into force. (Art. 113(a)) The […]

[…] FPF community who provided invaluable feedback on early drafts of this paper. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS All FPF materials that are released publicly are free to share and adapt with appropriate attribution. Learn more at creativecommons.org . About Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) The Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) is a non-profit organization that serves as a […]

[…] “sale,” law enforcement access, cross-border data transfers, and data localization (Part C) . All FPF materials that are released publicly are free to share and adapt with appropriate attribution. Learn more at creativecommons.org . About Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) The Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) is a non-profit organization that serves as a […]

[…] Privacy team provided comments to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration on Kids Online Health and Safety, as well as to the Federal Trade Commission on the Application for a New Parental Consent Method. FPF developed resources for stakeholders, such as the age assurance technologies infographic, which presents the risks and potential harms of […]