Search results

CA and UK Design Codes Comparison

[…] data management practices and design features that are likely to be accessed by a child. However, the UK AADC requires an assessment of risks to rights and freedoms, while the California AADC narrows this consideration to risks of “material detriment.” California AADC does not define “material detriment.” Again, the UK AADC includes more guidance […]

[…] is shared by all jurisdictions. A majority of the jurisdictions in this category expressly require that consent must be voluntary in the sense that the consent is free from vitiating factors like mistake, misrepresentation, fraud, or duress. Further, 10 of the 14 jurisdictions expressly require that consent must be informed (in at least certain […]

[…] to clarify when and how PETs should be deployed in different scenarios to ensure compliance with privacy laws; and providing tailored advice to lawmakers that wish to promote the use of PETs for the pursuit of public interest tasks and the responsible use of data.  On this note, Gilad Semama noted that PETs seem […]

[…] for nomination, or other general inquiries, please contact Shea Swauger at [email protected] . Start Application —> *Indicates a required answer. If you’re unsure about an answer, feel free to skip the question. If you have questions or want to discuss your project or application for any reason, please contact Shea Swauger at [email protected] . […]

[…] is going on in youth & education privacy today…What’s one thing that you are optimistic or encouraged about? I am encouraged by the move to age-appropriate design codes in some jurisdictions since it should lead to more products mapping better to the expectations of parents, educators, and children. What’s one thing that you are […]

[…] (Art 5)  This right expresses the ‘principle of transparency’ found under Article 16(2)(a); The right to access and obtain a copy of the data subject’s personal data free of charge, except for certain conditions that require a fee. (Art 7);  A right to rectification in which the data subject may complete, update, or correct […]

[…] for Policymakers Award are listed below. To learn more about the papers, judges, and authors, download the PPPM Digest.   Privacy Harms, by Danielle Keats Citron, University of Virginia School of Law; and Daniel J. Solove, George Washington University Law School This paper looks at how courts define harm in cases involving privacy violations and […]

[…] the National Science Foundation to facilitate dialogue between the academic community and industry on topics related to data protection and privacy. Presenters include: Elizabeth Arledge, University of Virginia, PhD Student – Robotic Process Automation In Simple Terms; Background and Use (Slides) Maximilian Voelker, M, Sc and PhD Student, University of Potsdam, Germany  – Toward […]

FREE