Search results

[…] status, but some critics argue that this determination should be a question of degree and should not prima facie destroy th e right to privacy. 119 In Virgil v. Time, Inc ., the court stated: “The line is to be drawn when the publicity ceases to be the giving of information to which the […]

[…] to protect information so as to avoid adverse publicity. As of April 12 ., 2010, f orty -six states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands ha ve enacted legislation requiring notification of security breaches. See the list maintained by the National Conference of State Legislators at http://www.ncsl.org/IssuesResearch/TelecommunicationsInformationTechnology/SecurityBreachNotificationLaws/tabid/13489/ Default.aspx 35 D. […]

SOLOVE .DOC 2/2/2006 4:27:56 PM 357 A MODEL REGIME OF PRIVACY PROTECTION Daniel J. Solove* Chris Jay Hoofnagle** A series of major security breaches at companies with sensitive personal information has sparked significant attention to the prob- lems with privacy protection in the United States. Currently, the pri- vacy protections in the United States are […]

[…] PII; and 8. Enforcement and Remedies Principle – Individuals should be able to enforce these regulations and should be entitled to a remedy upon a violation. See Virginia Boyd, Financial Privacy in the United States and the European Union: A Path to Transatlantic Regulatory Harmonization , 24 BERKELEY J. INT ’L L. 939, 958-9 […]

[…] identity: An unproven orthodoxy The past decade is littered with earnest identity ini tiatives that failed to get off the ground and security industry consortia that over- promised and under-delivered. We’ve endured endless deconstructions of “trust” and theoretical diss ertations on “identity” but none of this work has led to the sort of breakthrough […]

Sponsoring Trust in Tomorrow’s Technology: Towards a Global Digital Infrastructure Policy By John Miller and David Hoffman The information contained in this document represents the current view of Intel Corporation on the issues discussed as of the date of publication. This document is for informational purposes only. INTEL MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, […]

Corey A. Ciocchetti n r r 55 American Business Law Journal n Id. F F See, e.g Personal Information in Government Records: Protecting the Public Interest In Privacy 63, 118 & n.332 (2006) (defining personally identifying information with reference to the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C.552a(a)(4) (2000)); TRUSTe,Guidance on Model Web Site Disclosures, http://www.truste.org/docs/Model_Privacy_ […]

Dispelling the Myths Surrounding De-identification: Anonymization Remains a Strong Tool for Protecting Privacy Ann Cavoukian, Ph.D. Information & Privacy Commissioner, Ontario, Canada June 2011 Khaled El Emam, Ph.D. Canada Research Chair in Electronic Health Information, CHEO Research Institute and University of Ottawa Table of Contents Introduction ……………………………………………………………… ………. 1 Questioning the Value of De-identification ………………………………. […]

[…] L.Ed.2d 456 (1967)(Fortas, J., dissenting). See also Zacchini v. Scripps -Howard Broadcasting Co., 433 U.S. 562, 97 S.Ct. 2849, 53 L.Ed.2d 965 (1977); Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555, 579, 100 S.Ct. DRAFT – PUBLISHED IN WINTER 2002 -2003 3 The U.S. Constitution provides the framework for a common law right to […]

China’s Pragmatic Privacy Law beyond APEC: Does Generational Culture Matter?  By Cheryl L. Brown   Associate Professor  Department of Political Science  University of North Carolina at Charlotte  [email protected]  Paper Draft 1  Please do not quote without permission    Abstract     Culture and tradition remain significant influences  in China’s conception of privacy and  implementation of data protection laws.  At the sam e time, the National People’s  Congress’ initiation of privacy protection consider ation reveals the prospect of evolving  laws emphasizing protection of data privacy based o n domestic and international  developments.  Although a growing literature focuse s on Internet filtering and social  networking mining, this paper will examine five fac tors influencing national and  international perspectives of China’s approach to p rivacy and data protection: (1) privacy  concerns of RFID technology of China’s second-gener ation national identification card  (2) personal data leaks of consumer information by  banks, insurance companies, and real  estate companies as China seeks to build consumer t rust in the modern banking and  financial system; (3) data protection for citizens  of countries engaged with China across  borders in electronic commerce and outsourcing; (4)  privacy compatibility with  multinational and regional organizations in a soft  power era; and (5) the changing  leadership generations with backgrounds in the “sof t sciences” of  history, economics,  management, business, journalism, and law.  These f actors may offer useful comparisons  for addressing the convergence of an international  framework for privacy laws and data  protection.                                                        1 This paper draft was originally submitted to the I nformation Privacy Law Scholars Conference, June  2010.  The author is currently revising the paper.  2      […]