FPF Releases Practitioner Guides on Privacy Enhancing Technologies for Education Stakeholders
[…] synthetic data — where outputs are shared or published. PETs work best when integrated into existing data governance frameworks rather than treated as standalone solutions. FPF has actively contributed to shaping policy and practice around PETs through discussion papers, reports, stakeholder engagement, and its PETs Repository, launched in November 2024 as a centralized resource […]
SB 5 in Five: What to Know About Connecticut’s New AI Law
Connecticut’s SB 5 fits a lot of AI obligations into a small bill number. This week, Governor Lamont (D) signed the 39-section bill into law, creating new requirements across several fast-moving areas of AI policy, including companion chatbots, automated employment decision tools (AEDTs), social media, and provenance data. The law also includes provisions related to […]
Third Time’s the Charm: Connecticut Enacts Annual Privacy Update
[…] broker registry. Starting January 1, 2027, this bill would prohibit a “data broker” from selling or licensing “brokered personal data” in Connecticut unless the data broker is actively registered with the Department of Consumer Protection. Data Broker: Any business or portion of a business that sells or licenses brokered personal data to another person; […]
Colorado Revises Its AI Act: What Changed and Why
On May 15, Governor Polis signed SB 189, revising the Colorado AI Act (CAIA) after two years of intense negotiations and national debate over the original 2024 law’s approach to AI regulation. The revised law, the Colorado ADM Act (CADMA), reflects a fundamental shift in approach: shifting from an algorithmic discrimination framework to a transparency-focused […]
[FPF Member Comparison – Final] CAIA Revisions
S B 18 9 : Revis io n s to th e Colo ra d o AI Act C re a te d by: Ta tia na Ric e , Senio r Dir e cto r fo r U.S . Le g is la tio n B ack g ro u nd : E nacte […]
FPF_FTC_ANPRM_comment_food-retail-fees _personalized-pricing
1 3 5 0 Eye Str e et NW , Suit e 35 0, Wash in g to n, DC 20 005 | 20 2-7 6 8-8 9 50 | fp f.o rg F ile d on lin e at re g ula tio n s.g ov M ay 14 , 20 26 J o […]
FPF-Utah-Case-Study-R6
[…] this step resulted in a collaborative process between the legislature and the USBE. The collaboration process was important in Utah because it ensured that USBE had an active role in the process and was prepared for the task of implementing the law. Including relevant stakeholders in the legislative process can also alleviate unintended consequences […]
Student Privacy State Laws
Enter a state’s name: ▼ Show all Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode […]
The EU Commission’s Approach to Age Verification: Mobile Apps, DSA Enforcement, and Challenging National Social Media Bans
On 29 April 2026, the European Commission published its Recommendation for a common approach for EU-wide age verification technologies, a non-binding policy document with the aim of harmonizing future measures for the protection of children online. This blog post outlines the Commission’s emerging strategic approach to the implementation of EU-wide age verification measures, provides an […]
FPF-New-York-Case-Study-FINAL
MARCH 2023 WORK SMARTER NOT HARDER: How New York Leveraged Existing Education Services Infrastructure to Comply with New Privacy Laws The Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) is a non-profit organization that serves as a catalyst for privacy leadership and scholarship, advancing principled data practices in support of emerging technologies. Learn more about FPF by visiting […]