Future of Privacy Forum 2015 990 – Public Inspection Copy_FinalA
PUBLIC FILE Checkifself-employed OMB No. 1545-0047 Department of the TreasuryInternal Revenue Service Check ifapplicable: AddresschangeNamechangeInitialreturnFinalreturn/termin-ated Gross receipts $ AmendedreturnApplica-tionpending Are all subordinates included? 532001 12-16-15 Beginning of Current Year Paid Preparer Use Only Under section 501(c), 527, or 4947(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code (except private foundations) | Do not enter social security numbers on […]
Beyond IRBs Conference Proceedings_12-20-16
Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation or the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation or i ts trustees, officers, or staff . B EYOND IRB S: D ESIGNING E THICAL R EVIEW P ROCESSES FOR […]
mackey-elliot-and-ohara-anonymisation-decision-making-framework-v1-oct-2016
The Anonymisation Decision -making Fram e work E l a i n e M a c k e y , M a r k E l l i o t , K i e r o n O ’ H a r a 1. Intro ductio n The need for well -thought -out anonymisation has […]
FTC_DOC-308022A1
NEWS Federal Communications Commission 445 12 th Street, S.W. Washington, D. C. 20554 This is an unofficial announcement of Commission action. Release of the full text of a Commission order con stitutes official action. See MCI v. FCC. 515 F 2d 385 (D.C. Circ 1974). News Media Information 202 / 418 -0500 Internet: http://www.fcc.gov TTY: […]
PolonetskyGratton_RTBFpaper_FINAL
Privacy above all other Fundamental Rights? Challenges with the Implementation of a Right to be Forgotten in Canada* Eloïse Gratton** and Jules Polonetsky* ** Executive Summary This paper explores whether importing a “right to be forgotten” (RTBF) that would allow individuals to stop data search engines or other third parties, from providing links to information […]
Comments to NIST on Privacy Engineering
October 15, 2014 via email : [email protected] Ms. Diane Honeycutt Secretary Computer Security Division National Institute of Standards and Technology 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8930 Gaithersburg, MD 20899 Re: Public Comments, NIST Privacy Engineering Workshop Dear Ms. Honeycutt: The Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) is a think tank seeking to advance responsible data practices and […]
FPF_DataBenefitAnalysis_FINAL
Benefit-Risk Analysis for Big Data Projects Jules Polonetsky Omer Tene Joseph Jerome Benefit-Risk Analysis for Big Data Projects Jules Polonetsky Omer Tene Joseph Jerome September 201b About the Future of Privacy Forum Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) is a Washington, DC based think tank that seeks to advance responsible data practices. The forum is led […]
FPF_NTIA_BigDataPrivacyRFC
Future of Privacy Forum 919 18 th Street, NW, Suite 9 01 Washington, DC 20006 www.futureofprivacy.org August 5, 2014 Via e -mail: [email protected] National Telecommunications and Information Administration U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Avenue N.W., Room 4725 Washington, DC 20230 Re: Privacy RFC 2014 The Future of Priv acy Forum (FPF) is […]
FPF Safe Harbor Report
i PREFACE FROM THE CO -CHAIRS OF THE FUTURE OF PRIVACY FORUM As the Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) celebrates its fifth anniversary, we welcome the opportunity to participate in the discussions over trans -Atlantic privacy and, in particular, the effec tiveness and utility of the EU -US Safe Harbor. For five years, FPF has […]
Thierer_The Pursuit of Privacy in a World Where Information Control Is Failing
THE PURSUIT OF PRIVACY IN A W ORLD W HERE INFORMATION C ONTROL IS FAILING ADAM THIERER * INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………..410 I. NORMATIVE CONSIDERATIONS : T HE CHALLENGE OF DEFINING PRIVACY …………414 A. Privacy and “the Pursuit of Happiness” ……………………………………………..414 B. On the Problem of “Creepiness” as the Standard of Privacy Harm …………….417 C. Increasing Tensions Between Privacy Rights and Online Free Speech …..421 II. ENFORCEMENT COMPLICATIONS : C ONTROLLING INFORMATION FLOWS ……………..424 A. Media and Technological Convergence […]