Search results

[…] site or online service’s information practices must state the following: (1) Each The operator’s contact information, which at a minimum, must include the operator’s name, physical address, telephone number, and e -mail address; 4 (2) A description of what information each the operator collects from children, including whether the Web site or on line […]

[…] a good way to answer “acceptable level” tradeoff question s, as the following example illustrates .8 Imag ine that in a community that does not have a telephone book , everyone wo uld like to have one. However, each person prefers not to have his or her phone number listed and so refuses to […]

[…] rida v. Jardines, 569 U.S. _ _ (2013). 16 Katz, 389 U.S. at 351. 17 17 U.S.C. §102(b). 18 17 U.S.C. §103(b); Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Company, Inc., 499 U.S. 340 (1991) . BIG DATA AS A NEW INFORMATIONAL PRIVACY PARADIGM 5 one possible avenue, and to the extent that one […]

[…] wall of suspect’s office was not a trespass and therefore not a search); Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438, 457, 464 (1928) (holding that tapping of telephone wires outside suspects’ premises was not a trespass and therefore not a search). 24. See C HARLES H. WHITEBREAD & CHRISTOPHER SLOBOGIN , CRIMINAL PROCEDURE : […]

[…] Privacy in the Cloud 1649 within their walls. This distinction is critical with regard to the role of the cloud. In 1937, Coase wrote, “Changes like the telephone and the telegraph which tend to reduce the cost of organising spatially will tend to increase the size of the firm. All changes which improve managerial […]

[…]  DE  LA RÉPUBLIQUE  FRANÇAISE  [J.O.]  [OFFICIAL  JOURNAL  OF  THE  FRENCH  REPUBLIC ], Jan. 7, 1978, p. 227, art. 31, at 229.  89 Data Protection Directive, supra note 4, art. 8(1), at 40.  90 See id. art. 8(2)–(5), at 40–41.  91 Id. art. 15(1), at 43.   92 Id.    2013] THE EU-U.S. PRIVACY COLLISION 1979  panies and  telephone companies from doing within their respective  domains. 93  The result of the sectoral approach in the United States  makes newer technology companies a powerful voice in favor of the  regulatory status quo.  The rest of the world has not followed the U.S. approach.  In   almost two decades since the enactment of the Directive, it is the EU’s  privacy model that has proven highly influential.  According to   Professor Graham Greenleaf: “[S]omething reasonably described as  ‘European standard’ data privacy laws are becoming the norm in most  parts of the world with data privacy laws.” 94  He also sees the influ- ence of these EU-style laws as having increased in recent years. 95   Other experts have pointed to the influence of EU privacy laws inter- nationally. 96  Nonetheless, there is a deeper process underway, and it is not the  unilateral imposition of EU standards on the rest of the world.  Rath- er, mutual accommodation around shared lawmaking has occurred.   The U.S. government has successfully engaged in shaping the form  and meaning of EU data protection law.  U.S. companies have taken a  similar path of involvement with EU regulators.  Some of the high- lights of this phenomenon include the development of an EU-U.S. Safe  Harbor Program (2000), Model Contractual Clauses (2001, 2003), and  Binding Corporate Rules (2008). 97  This Article’s next section explores  […]

[…] not. For example, a person’s name and address, which clearly identify an individual, nevertheless might be considered public information, as such i nformation is typically listed in telephone books. In many cases, however, individuals have non- public data that they do not want matched to this allegedly public information. Yet, an approach that only […]

[…] as giving individuals meaningful notice regarding how their information is being used; (3) special protections f or sensitive data (for example, race, sexual preference, political views, or telephone numbers dialed), such as requiring opt -in consent before such data may be used or disclosed; and (4) some standards of enforcement to ensure compliance. 4 […]

[…] of up to 670% in the clickthrough rates of ads [34]. Although OBA is popular with advertisers, Internet users have concerns about the practice. In a 2009 telephone survey of 1,000 Americans by Turow et al. [29], 68% of respondents “denitely would not” and 19% “probably would not” allow advertisers to track them online […]

[…] -Messaging Technologies Call for a Return to Core Privacy Principles , 20 ALB. L.J. SCI. & TECH . 487, 497 –502 (2010) (explaining the five technologies, including telephone s ystems, e -mail, text messaging, instant messaging, and social networking); Strandburg, supra note 14 , at 655 –56 10 70 WASH. & LEE L. REV. […]