![post image](https://fpf.org/wp-content/themes/fpf/img/post.png)
Best Practices
Future of Privacy Forum’s Best Practices page is a central repository for privacy-related guidance documents, reports, codes of conduct, and other resources that can help you navigate complex issues and implement initiatives in privacy-protective ways.
![post image](https://fpf.org/wp-content/themes/fpf/img/post.png)
Protected: Future of Privacy Forum’s 2020 Annual Meeting
There is no excerpt because this is a protected post.
![Quentin Headshot2](https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/quentin-headshot2.jpg)
Quentin Palfrey
![Screen Shot 2020 07 30 At 10.09.43 Am 1200x545](https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Screen-Shot-2020-07-30-at-10.09.43-AM-1200x545-1.png)
FPF Releases Follow-Up Report on Consumer Genetics Companies and Practice of Transparency Reporting
Today, the Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) published “Consumer Genetic Testing Companies & The Role of Transparency Reports in Revealing Government Requests for User Data,” examining how leading consumer genetic testing companies require valid legal processes before disclosing consumer genetic information to the government, as well as how companies publish transparency reports around such disclosures. […]
![Us Capitol Building 2225764 1920](https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/us-capitol-building-2225764_1920.jpg)
11th Annual Privacy Papers for Policymakers — Call for Nominations
The Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) invites privacy scholars and authors with an interest in privacy issues to nominate finished papers for consideration for FPF’s annual Privacy Papers for Policymakers Award. PURPOSE To recognize the year’s leading privacy research and analytical work that is relevant to policymakers in the United States Congress, at U.S. federal […]
![2 Dna](https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2_dna.jpg)
California SB 980 Would Codify Many of FPF’s Best Practices for Consumer Genetic Testing Services, but Key Differences Remain
Authors: John Verdi (Vice President of Policy) and Katelyn Ringrose (Christopher Wolf Diversity Law Fellow) In July 2018, the Future of Privacy Forum released Privacy Best Practices for Consumer Genetic Testing Services. FPF developed the Best Practices following consultation with technical experts, regulators, leading consumer genetic and personal genomic testing companies, and civil society. The […]
![post image](https://fpf.org/wp-content/themes/fpf/img/post.png)
Contact
Phone (202) 220-8062 Mailing Address Future of Privacy Forum1350 Eye Street NWSuite 350Washington, DC 20005 Future of Privacy ForumAvenue Marnix 13-171000 Brussels, Belgium Future of Privacy Forum9 Straits View #06-07Marina One West Tower018937 SingaporeRepublic of Singapore Israel Tech Policy InstituteRothschild Blvd 74Tel Aviv – Yaffo, Israel 6521404
![Gdpr Age Of Digital Consent Spc Image](https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/GDPR-Age-of-Digital-Consent-SPC-Image.png)
The European Commission Considers Amending the General Data Protection Regulation to Make Digital Age of Consent Consistent
The European Commission published a Communication on its mandated two-year evaluation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on June 24, 2020 in which it discusses as a future policy development “the possible harmonisation of the age of children consent in relation to information society services.” Notably, harmonizing the age of consent for children across […]
![Screen Shot 2020 07 21 At 11.16.10 Am](https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Screen-Shot-2020-07-21-at-11.16.10-AM.png)
FPF & BrightHive Release Playbook to Create Responsible Contact Tracing Initiatives, Address Privacy & Ethics Concerns
A new playbook from the Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) and BrightHive, Responsible Data Use Playbook for Digital Contact Tracing, provides a series of considerations to assist stakeholders in setting up a digital contact tracing initiative to track and manage the spread of COVID-19, while addressing privacy concerns raised by these technologies in an ethical, […]