Search results

Privacy Papers for Policy Makers 2009-2010 Cover The publication of “Privacy Papers for Policy Makers” was supported by AT&T, LexisNexis, Microsoft and Procter & Gamble Inside front cover September 15, 2010 We are delighted to provide you with this Journal featuring works selected by the Future of Privacy Forum Advisory Board as the best “Privacy […]

[…] Research Officer at the National Research Council of Canada, and prior to that he was head of the Quantitative Methods Group at the Fraunhofer Institute in Kaiserslautern, Germany. In 2003 and 2004, he was ranked as the top systems and software engineering scholar worldwide by the Journal of Systems and Software based on his […]

[…] Deactivation When Children are Travelling in the Front Passenger Seat, in Proceedings of the 21st International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, June 2009, Stuttgart, Germany , http://www -nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/esv/esv21/09 – 0351.pdf . 166 Article 13 of the e -Privacy Directive. 167 The Telephone Consumer Protection Act , 47 U.S.C. § 227 ; […]

[…] infringed.” 14 When privacy is not directly mentioned in constitutions, the courts of many countries have recognized implicit constitutional rights to pri- vacy, such as Canada, France, Germany, Japan, and India. 15 In addition, thousands of laws protect privacy around the world. Multinational privacy guidelines, directives, and frameworks have in- fluenced the passage of […]

Future of Privacy Forum ■ 919 18 th Street, NW, Suite 901 ■ Washington, DC 20006 www.futureofprivacy.org April 20, 2015 National Telecommunications and Information Administration U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Room 4725 Washington, DC 20230 Re: UAS RFC 2015 Dear Mr. Verdi: The Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) is a think tank […]

Draft June 16 , 2011 Forthcoming 114 West Virginia Law R eview * Assistant Professor, University of Louisville, Louis D. Brandeis School of Law; J.D., University of Michigan. The author extends thanks to the many scholars who helped with this piece. The author cannot overstate her appreciation for Nancy Levit ‘s review of earlier drafts. […]

[…] –  conspicuousl y  and  clearly.    The  FIP  of  choice  deals with visitor control over the collection, use and dissemination of  their PII. 71  This discussion must  include  a  discussion  of  control  over  PII  utilized  in  a  manner  different   then  promised  upon  collection.   Describing choice-related privacy provisions is important bec ause visitors are less likely to perceive PII  •  identification of the uses to which the data will b e put [Choice];   •  identification of any potential recipients of the d ata [Choice];   •  the  nature  of  the  data  collected  and  the  means  by  w hich  it  is  collected  […]

[…] international influence. Thus, in 1980, the Privacy Guidelines of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) followed the recently enacted first federal data protection law of Germany. 318 The OECD is a group of leading industrial countries, including the U.S., and the OEC D Guidelines provide a non- binding framework for its member […]

Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1862264 L EGAL S TUDIES R ESEARCH P APER S ERIES PAPER N O. 1 1-0 6-0 6 June 2011 T HE L IMITS OF T ORT PRIVACY by Neil M. Richards Professor of Law Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1862264Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1862264 DO NOT DELETE 6/20/2011 3:35 PM 357 […]

[…] Brotherhood could pull it off . But in classified briefings, the Director of National Intelligence told President Booker that he thought the threat was extremely real. Omar’s promised “surp rise” was likely some kind of biological attack. Some attacks might fail. But others could work. The overall damage to life and to the economy […]