Search results

The Future of Privacy Forum’s Asia-Pacific office launches today in Singapore under the leadership of Dr. Clarisse Girot. As Director of the FPF Asia-Pacific office, she is responsible for developing and implementing FPF’s strategy in the world’s biggest and most populated region. We have asked Dr. Girot to share her thoughts for FPF’s blog […]

[…] leaders within the privacy and equity communities to develop actionable guiding principles and a framework to help bolster the responsible implementation of digital contact tracing technologies (DCTT). Today, seven privacy, civil rights, and health equity organizations signed on to these guiding principles for organizations implementing DCTT. “We learned early in our Privacy and Pandemics […]

[…] economic, and professional opportunities. If regulation is to be effective, it should focus on both technical details and the underlying values and rights that must be protected from adverse uses of AI, to ensure that AI is ultimately used to promote human dignity and welfare. A .pdf version of the printed paper is available here.

[…] to unauthorized individuals. Security best practices require that authentication be accomplished via a multi-factor system, requiring two of the three options: something you know (password or pin code, security question), something you have (a smart card, specific mobile device, or USB token), or something you are (a biometric).  Once an ID holder is authenticated, […]

[…] trend to modernize their regulatory approach, several of them proposing sandboxes (e.g., the CNIL and the Norwegian DPA), and pushing for more self-regulation, like the adoption of Codes of Conduct. DPAs also plan on dedicating efforts to make GDPR compliance work in practice on a large scale by targeting the empowerment of DPOs and […]

[…] associated with ensuring that data is deleted, given how it is currently stored and processed, and (3) compatibility with the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution ( free speech). The committee has also stated that UPDPA’s restrictions on processing for compatible uses or incompatible uses with consent should provide sufficient protection. Pseudonymized Data  “Pseudonymized […]

[…] key aspect of market dominance. The Order specifically highlights the impact of serial mergers in the technology sector on user privacy, identifying privacy and competition among “ free” products as factors that should be considered as part of the enhanced scrutiny of mergers. The Fact Sheet explains that this is particularly relevant in the […]

[…] a series of examples of intangible concrete harms, many of them traditional privacy harms, including: reputational harms, disclosure of private information, intrusion upon seclusion, and infringement of free exercise. The Court then concludes that the subset of the class who had the false information about them disclosed had suffered a reputational injury, a type […]

[…] Using a researcher-friendly version of Empatica’s E4 device that prevents the collection of geolocation data, IP address, or mobile International Mobile Equipment Identity (IMEI) identifiers. Using QR codes to link participants to specific wearable devices to ensure that participant names and study record IDs would not be shared. Learn more about the project, including […]

[…] all plans, processes, and frameworks throughout the research collaboration. Use Technology to Enhance Privacy. The Stanford research team and Empatica took advantage of technology, where possible, to promote privacy throughout the project. Stanford employed QR codes to prevent the need to share participant identifiers, including names and study record IDs, with Empatica. Use Privacy-Protective […]