Search results

Following the enactment of India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 (DPDPA), the Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) and nasscom (National Association of Software and Service Companies), India’s largest industry association for the information technology sector, co-hosted a 2-part webinar series focused on the consent-centric regime under the DPDP Act. Spread across two days […]

[…] indicated that this did “not exclude additional UOOMs from meeting the requirements” in the future. This could mean the other shortlisted opt out mechanisms (i.e., the OptOut Code or the Opt-Out Machine) or some tool that has not yet been developed may be able to be approved in the future. However, the process for […]

[…] Jersey, only the Colorado Privacy Act’s implementing regulations required that DPAs occur prior to initiating processing. Following the NetChoice v. Bonta litigation, which saw California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act preliminarily enjoined, this requirement could raise First Amendment concerns if it is interpreted as a prior restraint on speech. 3. Thresholds for Applicability S332 is […]

[…] one company and then shared or sold to another. While data collection can benefit both you and businesses – like connecting with friends, getting directions, or sales promotions – it can also be used in invasive ways unless you take control. You can protect your personal data and information in many ways and control […]

[…] AI Verify, the IMDA and the PDPC hope that the global AI testing community can gravitate towards workable standards in various industries and use cases.  Third, to promote user trust, AI Verify permits organizations to conduct self-testing on premises, and also allows for third-party testing. The AI Verify Foundation, which oversees the development and […]

[…] sometimes longer. According to the discussion paper, the FDA strives to “facilitate innovation while safeguarding public health” and plans to develop a “flexible risk-based regulatory framework that promotes innovation and protects patient safety.” Lesson 2: Different uses of data may implicate different regulatory structures While there can be uncertainty regarding whether particular data, such […]

[…] sometimes longer. According to the discussion paper, the FDA strives to “facilitate innovation while safeguarding public health” and plans to develop a “flexible risk-based regulatory framework that promotes innovation and protects patient safety.” Lesson 2: Different uses of data may implicate different regulatory structures While there can be uncertainty regarding whether particular data, such […]

[…] and data protection with many of you at key conferences and events across the globe, including in Washington, DC, Brussels, Tokyo, Singapore, Bermuda, and Tel Aviv. As India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act sprinted through its final stages in August after several years of debates, postponements, and negotiations, FPF provided an in-depth, comprehensive explainer […]

[…] e-Safety Commissioner Several participants found deficits in the length and scope of the public consultation available throughout the process Participants identified several potential benefits of an industry code beyond its intended scope Participants broadly opposed any approach that would require otherwise encrypted messaging services to utilize content hashing and/or client-side scanning  Many participants discussed […]

[…] the conversation around the evolving state privacy landscape; however, they gained new life in September when an Obama-appointed federal judge enjoined California’s novel California Age Appropriate Design Code Act (AADC) from taking effect. What impact will this injunction and ongoing litigation involving the AADC have on the broader U.S. privacy landscape? Adopted in 2022, […]