Showing results for virg 20lines promised sri lanka virg 20lines
The_Privacy_Matrix
[…] 2002 (discussing a settlementbetween the attorneys general of nine states (Arizona, California, Connecticut, Massachusetts,Michigan, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Vermont, and Washington) and DoubleClickwhereby the company promised not to use certain pieces of PII obtained from cookies in placingweb-based advertisements).38.Web beacons are also commonly referred to as web bugs, clear gifs, and pixel […]
Privacy_The_Lost_Right_Jon_Mills_2008
[…] 81 (E.D.N.Y. 1987) (holding that bogus and insincere religious beliefs are not grounds for exemption from New York’s mandatory school inoculation program). 11 See, e.g., Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967). Miscegenation statutes of the past are one example of a prohibition that can only be based on a moral reason rather than […]
2011_Privacy Papers for Policy Makers_9.7.11
2011_Privacy Papers for Policy Makers_9.7.11
Toward a Cohesive Interpretation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act for the Electronic Monitoring of Employees
Draft June 16 , 2011 Forthcoming 114 West Virginia Law R eview * Assistant Professor, University of Louisville, Louis D. Brandeis School of Law; J.D., University of Michigan. The author extends thanks to the many scholars who helped with this piece. The author cannot overstate her appreciation for Nancy Levit ‘s review of earlier […]
The_Future_of_Privacy_Policies_ A_Privacy_Nutrition_Label_Filled
[…] – conspicuousl y and clearly. The FIP of choice deals with visitor control over the collection, use and dissemination of their PII. 71 This discussion must include a discussion of control over PII utilized in a manner different then promised upon collection. Describing choice-related privacy provisions is important bec ause visitors are less likely to perceive PII • identification of the uses to which the data will b e put ; • identification of any potential recipients of the d ata ; • the nature of the data collected and the means by w hich it is collected […]
The PII Problem Privacy and a New Concept of Personally Identifiable Information
[…] federal, state or local law.” Id. 67 Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, 47 U.S.C. § 551(a)(2)(A) (1984). 68 Id. 69 The number of Comcast customers in Virginia who subscribe to HBO is an example of aggregate data under the Cable Act. 16 protects non- public information as PII might not preclude such combinations. […]