Search results

[…] Proposed Risk-Utility Framework for Novel Advertising Solutions (v 1.0), which will be open for Public Comment until May 26, 2024. Download the Proposed Risk-Utility Framework HERE FPF welcomes public comments until May 26, 2024 The digital advertising industry is in the midst of a sea change. Around the world, privacy regulators have become far […]

[…] neurodata. Perhaps the most consequential call for action was the 2022 Neurorights Model Law, drafted by the Latin American and Caribbean Parliament (Parlatino), a regional organization that promotes regional integration through legislative harmonization. The model law provides both structure and foundational concepts to regulate neurotechnology, including establishing an independent oversight authority and providing redress […]

[…] with FPF CEO Jules Polonetsky providing opening remarks. Watch the virtual event here. For the in-person event on Capitol Hill, Jordan Francis, FPF’s Elise Berkower Fellow, provided welcome remarks and emceed the night, thanking Alan Raul, FPF Board President, and Debra Berlyn, FPF Board Treasurer, for being present. Mr. Francis noted he was excited […]

[…] Act is a comprehensive, binding law, with broad extraterritorial effect and is therefore poised to play a crucial role in the global debate on AI regulation. We welcome the openness and foresight of the European Union’s lawmakers to adopt a definition of AI systems that is interoperable with that proposed by the OECD.  At […]

[…] to the Digital Services Act (DSA) and EU AI Act, and debated the future of enforcement of a new set of data laws in Europe.  Attendees were welcomed by Dr Gianclaudio Malgieri, Associate Professor of Law & Technology at Leiden University and co-Director of the Brussels Privacy Hub, and Jules Polonetsky, CEO at the […]

[…] indicated that this did “not exclude additional UOOMs from meeting the requirements” in the future. This could mean the other shortlisted opt out mechanisms (i.e., the OptOut Code or the Opt-Out Machine) or some tool that has not yet been developed may be able to be approved in the future. However, the process for […]

[…] Jersey, only the Colorado Privacy Act’s implementing regulations required that DPAs occur prior to initiating processing. Following the NetChoice v. Bonta litigation, which saw California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code Act preliminarily enjoined, this requirement could raise First Amendment concerns if it is interpreted as a prior restraint on speech. 3. Thresholds for Applicability S332 is […]

[…] one company and then shared or sold to another. While data collection can benefit both you and businesses – like connecting with friends, getting directions, or sales promotions – it can also be used in invasive ways unless you take control. You can protect your personal data and information in many ways and control […]

[…] permits organizations to conduct self-testing on premises, and also allows for third-party testing. The AI Verify Foundation, which oversees the development and adoption of AI Verify, also welcomes users to contribute codes and plug-ins to enhance the toolkit.  Fourth, and crucially, AI Verify has presently been developed to support supervised learning AI models (e.g. […]

[…] sometimes longer. According to the discussion paper, the FDA strives to “facilitate innovation while safeguarding public health” and plans to develop a “flexible risk-based regulatory framework that promotes innovation and protects patient safety.” Lesson 2: Different uses of data may implicate different regulatory structures While there can be uncertainty regarding whether particular data, such […]