Showing results for 201 380 205 1127 20how 20to book 20united flight singapore airlines phone number 201 380 20241127 201 380 205 1127 201 380 205 1127 20how 20to book 20united number 201 380 20241127 201 380 205 1127 201 380 205 1127 201 380 20241127 201 380 205 1127
Leong_CV_Feb2021
[…] AL International Relations MS 1990 George Mason University Arlington, VA Law JD 2014 Law School WORK HISTORY 2014 – Present, Future of Privacy Forum ( https://fpf.org/ ) 201 8 – present, Senior Counsel & Director of AI and Ethics . O versees a team to consider the privacy impact and analysis of AI and […]
The_Privacy_Matrix
[…] that the DPPA was upheld over a state federalismchallenge).200.18 U.S.C. § 2721(a) (limiting coverage to “a State department of motor vehicles, and anyofficer, employee, or contractor thereof.”). 201.FTC, About Identity Theft, http://ftc.gov/hcp/edu/ microsites/idtheft/consumers/about-identity-theft.html [hereinafter FTC, Identity Theft Web Site] (last visited July 31, 2007) (definingauthority to regulate issues intrastate commerce such as state drivinglicenses. […]
To Track Or Not To Track
[…] May 10, 2011, http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearings/hearing.cfm?id=5157 . 25 See Article 29 Data Protection Working Party Opinion on Geolocation services on smart mobile devices, WP 1 85 , May 16, 201 1, http://ec.europa.eu/justice/policies/privacy/docs/wpdocs/2011/wp185_en.pdf ; MSISDN , Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MSISDN ; International Mobile Equipment Identity , Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Mobile_Equipment_Identity . Moe Rahnema , Overview of the GSM system and protoco […]
Workplace Privacy and Monitoring The Quest for Balanced Interests
[…] The Littler Mendelson Employment and Labor Law Lecture at Cleveland –Marshall College of Law presented on March 31, 2011. The author thanks Daniel Myers , 2010 – 201 1 Submissions Editor for the Cleveland State Law Review for transcribing the lecture and Elisabeth Fitzpatrick for her superb research and editorial assistance. 1 Michael Selmi, […]
Toward a Cohesive Interpretation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act for the Electronic Monitoring of Employees
[…] 2006 ILL. L. REV . 357 (2006). 10 Richard A. Bales & Richard O. Hamilton, Jr., Workplace Investigations in Kentucky , 27 N. KY. L. REV . 201 (2000); Kevin J. Baum, Comment, E-mail in the Workplace and the Right of Privacy , 42 VILL . L. REV . 1011 (1997) ; Elise M. […]
The PII Problem Privacy and a New Concept of Personally Identifiable Information
[…] “any other identifier that the [Federal Trade Commission (FTC)] determines permits the physical or online contacting of a specific individual.” 77 70 Massachusetts Breach Notification Statu te, 201 Mass. Code Regs. § 17.00 et seq. (2010) . In 2000, the FTC made 71 201 Mass. Code Regs. § 17.02 (2010). 72 Song-Beverly Credit Card […]
The Limits of Torts Privacy
Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1862264 L EGAL S TUDIES R ESEARCH P APER S ERIES PAPER N O. 1 1-0 6-0 6 June 2011 T HE L IMITS OF T ORT PRIVACY by Neil M. Richards Professor of Law Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1862264Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1862264 DO NOT DELETE 6/20/2011 3:35 PM […]
The Failure of Online Social Network Privacy Settings
[…] Figure 2. Each chart represents the distribution of pro les for 8 Figure 2: Typical Facebook interactions with each pro le group. Show Apathetic Hide Friend 389 201 190 Network Member 152 209 419 Friend of Friend 155 228 397 Stranger 89 166 525 Table 5: Sharing intentions for each pro le group that […]
The Case for Online Obscurity
[…] 862 (Iowa 1962); Brents v. Morgan, 299 S.W. 967 (Ky. 1927); Beaumont v. Brown, 257 N.W.2d 522 (Mich. 1977). 3 See, e.g., Sipple v. Chronicle Publ‘g Co., 201 Ca. Rptr. 665 (Cal. Ct. App. 1984); Virgil v. Time, 527 F.2d 1122 (9th Cir. 1975); Neff v. Time, Inc., 406 F. Supp. 858 (W.D. Pa. […]
Social_Network_Theory_of_Privacy
[…] a fact has been reported in the press, courts hold that it is no longer private, and third parties can disseminate the fact with immunity. See , for example, Sipple v Chronicle Publishing Co, 154 Cal App 3d 1040, 201 Cal Rptr 665, 669-70 ( 1984) . Nevertheless, an influential columnist invoked Cheney’s privacy as a basis for c riticizing Kerry and Edwards. See William Safire, […]