Search results

[…] The Littler Mendelson Employment and Labor Law Lecture at Cleveland –Marshall College of Law presented on March 31, 2011. The author thanks Daniel Myers , 2010 – 201 1 Submissions Editor for the Cleveland State Law Review for transcribing the lecture and Elisabeth Fitzpatrick for her superb research and editorial assistance. 1 Michael Selmi, […]

[…] 2006 ILL. L. REV . 357 (2006). 10 Richard A. Bales & Richard O. Hamilton, Jr., Workplace Investigations in Kentucky , 27 N. KY. L. REV . 201 (2000); Kevin J. Baum, Comment, E-mail in the Workplace and the Right of Privacy , 42 VILL . L. REV . 1011 (1997) ; Elise M. […]

[…] of PII also includes “any other identifier that the determines permits the physical or online contacting of a specific individual.” 77 70 Massachusetts Breach Notification Statu te, 201 Mass. Code Regs. § 17.00 et seq. (2010) . In 2000, the FTC made 71 201 Mass. Code Regs. § 17.02 (2010). 72 Song-Beverly Credit Card […]

Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1862264 L EGAL S TUDIES R ESEARCH P APER S ERIES PAPER N O. 1 1-0 6-0 6 June 2011 T HE L IMITS OF T ORT PRIVACY by Neil M. Richards Professor of Law Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1862264Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1862264 DO NOT DELETE 6/20/2011 3:35 PM […]

[…] Figure 2. Each chart represents the distribution of pro les for 8 Figure 2: Typical Facebook interactions with each pro le group. Show Apathetic Hide Friend 389 201 190 Network Member 152 209 419 Friend of Friend 155 228 397 Stranger 89 166 525 Table 5: Sharing intentions for each pro le group that […]

[…] 862 (Iowa 1962); Brents v. Morgan, 299 S.W. 967 (Ky. 1927); Beaumont v. Brown, 257 N.W.2d 522 (Mich. 1977). 3 See, e.g., Sipple v. Chronicle Publ‘g Co., 201 Ca. Rptr. 665 (Cal. Ct. App. 1984); Virgil v. Time, 527 F.2d 1122 (9th Cir. 1975); Neff v. Time, Inc., 406 F. Supp. 858 (W.D. Pa. […]

[…] a  fact  has  been  reported  in  the  press,  courts  hold  that  it  is  no  longer  private,  and  third  parties can disseminate the fact with immunity. See , for example,  Sipple v Chronicle Publishing  Co,  154  Cal  App  3d  1040,  201  Cal  Rptr  665,  669-70  ( 1984) .  Nevertheless,  an  influential  columnist  invoked  Cheney’s  privacy  as  a  basis  for  c riticizing  Kerry  and  Edwards.  See  William  Safire,  […]

Second Summer Webinar: California’s CCPA and Education Working Group Date: July 31, 2018 Time: 3:30pm – 5:00pm Note: Chatham House Rules Apply Speaker #1: Ariel Johnson @ Common Sense Media California Consumer Privacy Act o Fall 2017 ​: Privacy Initiative filed in CA to be put on the ballot ▪ Lead proponent of the […]

[…] with  pos itive  or  neutral  content  generated  by  the  individual  herself  in  an  attempt  t o  drown  out  the  abusive  content. 200   Search engine optimization techniques involve the  manipulation  of search engine results so that positive or neutra l information is prioritized  in searches above harmful information. 201   Many of these tools are currently  utilized by private online reputation defense servi ces, but there is no reason  individuals  cannot  not  learn  how  to  use  them  withou t  needing  to  pay  the                                                     195   In  fact,  Facebook  has  recently  simplified  […]

[…] this effect. 1 Criminals use stolen personal information in many ways. For example they can incur fraudulent charges on existing accounts, or apply for new utilities ( phone, electrical, television, Inter net) and financial accounts (such as credit cards, mortgages, and loans). 2 This value was calculated as the estimated number of identity theft […]