Search results

[…] 81 . See Smolla, supra note 63 , at 1097 (noting the current trend of pr ivacy erosion). 82 . See Sipple v. Chronicle Publ’g Co. , 201 Cal . Rptr. 665, 666 (Ct. App. 1984) (chronicling the newspaper reporting on Sipple’s sexual orientation). 83 . See RESTATEMENT (SECOND ) OF TORTS § 652D […]

Penn State Law Review Winter, 2010 Articles *809 PEOPLE CAN BE SO FAKE: A NEW DIMENSION TO PRIVACY AND TECHNOLOGY SCHOLARSHIP M. Ryan Calo [FNa1] Copyright (c) 2010 The Dickensen School of Law of The Pennsylvania State University; M. Ryan Calo This article updates the traditional discussion of privacy and technology, focused since the […]

[…] Privacy Act, 197 the Cable Communica- tions Privacy Act, 198 the Video Privacy Protection Act, 199 the Employee Polygraph Protection Act, 200 the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 201 the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act, 202 and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act 203 all allow states to craft protections that exceed federal law. Even the FCRA allows for […]

[…] 2015, https://www.eff.org/files/internet -engineers -letter.pdf . 50 Bambauer, Derek E. “Censorship V3.1,” 18 IEEE Internet Computing 26 (May/June 2013), Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 12-28, September 9, 201 2, accessed August 11, 2015, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2144004&download=yes . 51 Herold, David Kurt, and Peter Marolt (eds.) “Online Society in China: Creating, celebrating, and instrumentalizing the online carnival,” […]

[…] (LexisNexis 2007); M INN . STAT . ANN . § 13.15 (West 2007); M ONT . CODE ANN . §§2-17-550-53 (2007); N.Y. STATE TECH . LAW §§ 201-07 (Consol. 2007); T EX . GOV ‘T CODE ANN . § 2054.126 (Vernon Supp. 2006); and V A. CODE ANN . §§ 2.2-3800-03 (2007). 182 M […]

[…] for improper disclosure.    “Routine use” is defined as “the use of such a rec ord for a purpose which is  compatible with the purpose for which it was collec ted.” 41 The Privacy Act Guidelines of  July 9, 1975 42 clarify this tautology by explaining that “routine  use” is not dependent on  frequency of use: it is meant to include both “the  common and ordinary uses to which  records are put” and “all of the proper and necessa ry uses even if such use occurs                                                     38 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(3), (a)(7). 39 Several authors have recognized the expansive natu re of routine uses, but none have performed  categorical or comparative analysis of what they do  in SORNs. See, e.g., Nathan Alexander Sales,  Share  and Share Alike: Intelligence Agencies and Informat ion Sharing, 78 G EO . WASH . L. REV . 279 ( 2010) (only  briefly noting the routine use exception but not ob serving its scope in practice); Dennis J. McMahon,  Comment,  The Future Of Privacy In A Unified National Health  Information Infrastructure, 38 S ETON  HALL  L. REV . 787, 797 (2008) (discussing the routine use excep tion in the context of health information as  the “most glaring loophole”, but not observing how  it operates in practice); Fred H. Cate, Government Data  Mining: The Need for a Legal Framework , 43 H ARV . CIV. RIGHTS -C IV. LIBERTIES  L. REV . 435  (2008)(noting the routine use exemption); Jonathan  C. Bond, Defining Disclosure in a Digital Age:  Updating the Privacy Act for the Twenty-First Centu ry, 76 G EO . WASH […]

[…] European Community adopted the Directive on the Protection of Individuals w ith Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data 201 to create an EU wide regime that sets governance rules for member states to follow .202 The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development‘s (OECD) Guidelines on […]

4/25/ 2018 Copyright, Privacy, Federal Data Bills Get T ech Lobby’s Attention https://communicationsdaily .com/article/view?s=219390&id=546751 1/2 ⟨ PR EV IO US T O DAY ‘S N EW S: W ed n esd ay, A pril 2 5, 2 018 (5 o f 3 7) ⟩ NEX T ‘P ere n nia l’ F avo rit […]

[…] supra (contraception); Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 93 S.Ct. 705, 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (19 73)(abortion); Doe v. Bolton, 410 U.S. 179, 93 S.Ct. 739, 35 L.Ed.2d 201 (1973)(abortion); Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth, 428 U.S. 52, 96 S.Ct. 2831, 49 L.Ed.2d 788 (1976)(abortion). 98 Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 152, […]

[…] So  Fake:  A  New  Dimension  to  Privacy  a nd  Technology Scholarship , 114 P ENN . ST. L. REV . 809, 842-48 (2010).   90 M ICHEL  FOUCAULT , DISCIPLINE  AND  PUNISH : THE  BIRTH OF THE  PRISON  200 (1979).  91 Id . at 200-01. 92 Id.  at  201 (“Hence the major effect of the Panopticon:  to induce in the inmate a state  of  consciousness  and  permanent  visibility  that  assu res  the  automatic  functioning  of  power.”).  Cf. Arthur Miller,  Privacy: Is There Any Left? , 3 F ED . CT. L. REV . 87, 100 (2009)  (“It  does  not  matter  if  there  […]