Search results

[…] several rounds of rulemaking by both the Attorney General and the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA). The latest regulations from the CPPA are some of the most significant yet. Starting January 1, 2026, businesses will be subject to extensive new obligations concerning automated decisionmaking technology (ADMT), risk assessments, and cybersecurity audits. Today, the Future […]

[…] utilizes, clarifies, or modifies existing liability regimes’ application to AI.  The most commonly enrolled or enacted frameworks include AI’s application in healthcare, chatbots, and innovation safeguards. Legislatures signaled an interest in balancing consumer protection with support for AI growth, including testing novel innovation-forward mechanisms, such as sandboxes and liability defenses. Looking ahead to 2026, […]

G en era ti ve AI fo r Org an iz a ti on al Use : I n te rn al Polic y Cons id era tio ns F u tu re of Priv a cy Fo ru m , up d ate d Ju ne 20 24 C O NSID ER ATIO […]

PRIVACY COMMUNITIES FPF Privacy Communitie s bring industry leaders together with FPF staff and experts to develop best practices, share insights, and promote pragmatic public policy solutions. Privacy Community members receive regular written updates on developments in their field. FPF members can access these privacy communities via the FPF Member Portal. For those without […]

FPF holder

Julie Brill and Jocelyn Aqua also join FPF as senior fellows  Washington, D.C. — The Future of Privacy Forum (FPF), a global non-profit focused on data protection, AI, and emerging technologies, is pleased to announce the election of Anne Bradley, Peter Lefkowitz, Nuala O’Connor, and Harriet Pearson to its Board of Directors. These accomplished […]

[…] 53, the RAISE Act was inspired by last year’s SB 1047 and seeks to regulate frontier AI models. Hochul has as late as January 1, 2026, to sign, veto, or issue chapter amendments, a process that allows the governor to negotiate substantial changes with the legislature at the time of signature. Given Newsom’s signature […]

[…] to opt-out, and appeal adverse decisions. It would also prohibit use of a high-risk AI system that produces algorithmic discrimination or has not passed an independent audit. Virginia HB 2094 (Veto’ed by Governor) Del. Maldonado (D) High-Risk AI / Automated Decisionmaking Would regulate AI systems used in consequential decisions, requiring entities to use reasonable […]

[…] strong concern that replicating the EU AI Act could create regulatory overreach. However, civil society groups argue that even comprehensive frameworks like the Colorado AI Act or Virginia’s HB 2094 (vetoed) are significantly narrower in scope and that highlighting that superficial similarities with the EU AI Act, such as shared definitions or structural references, […]