Search results

[…] sometimes longer. According to the discussion paper, the FDA strives to “facilitate innovation while safeguarding public health” and plans to develop a “flexible risk-based regulatory framework that promotes innovation and protects patient safety.” Lesson 2: Different uses of data may implicate different regulatory structures While there can be uncertainty regarding whether particular data, such […]

[…] e-Safety Commissioner Several participants found deficits in the length and scope of the public consultation available throughout the process Participants identified several potential benefits of an industry code beyond its intended scope Participants broadly opposed any approach that would require otherwise encrypted messaging services to utilize content hashing and/or client-side scanning  Many participants discussed […]

[…] the year that the public first experiences widespread enforcement of their new privacy rights? One structural reason for a lack of visible enforcement actions may be that Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, and until recently, California all provide the ability for businesses to ‘cure’ many or all alleged violations of their privacy laws before a formal […]

[…] considered show four primary categories of laws being considered by state regulators: Platform Accountability Laws, Age Verification Laws, Social Media Metering Laws, and the California Age-Appropriate Design Code (CA AADC). In recent actions, the Federal Trade Commission has stepped up enforcement of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA). Finally, the U.S. Congress has […]

[…] fitness for purpose; Organizations should implement AI governance frameworks informed by the NIST AI Risk Management Framework; Organizations should not claim that AI hiring tools are “bias- free;” and AI hiring tools should be designed and operated with informed human oversight and engagement. “When properly designed and utilized, AI must process vast amounts of […]

[…] key area of concern, as well as putting in place mitigation and monitoring measures to ensure personal data generated through such tools are accurate, complete and up-to-date, free from discriminatory, unlawful, or otherwise unjustifiable effects. Other areas of concern mentioned were transparency to promote openness and explainability; production of technical documentation across the AI […]

[…] start to be actively promoted within digital services and products, centering privacy as a key market value, regulators must consider that certain companies might be able to get a competitive advantage through the early development and deployment of PETs. To avoid additional market deficiencies caused by privacy-enhancing technologies, regulators have an important task at […]

[…] The ten interplay areas we are highlighting are: Manipulative design in online interfaces; Targeted advertising based on sensitive data; Targeted advertising and protection of minors; Recommender systems free-of-profiling; Recommender systems and advertising transparency; Access to data for researchers and competent authorities; Takedown of illegal content; Risk Assessments; Compliance function and the DSA legal representative; […]

[…] Valid Consent Has Strict Requirements, Is Withdrawable, And Can be Exercised Through Consent Managers The DPDP Act requires that consent for processing of personal data be “ free, specific, informed, unconditional and unambiguous with a clear affirmative action.” These conditions are similarly strict to those required under the GDPR, highlighting that the people whose […]

[…] FPF CEO, and Takeshige Sugimoto, Managing Partner at S&K Brussels LPC and FPF Senior Fellow, hosted the Symposium.  The G7 DPA Agenda, built on three pillars: Data Free Flow with Trust, emerging technologies, and enforcement cooperation The DPAs of the G7 nations started to meet annually in 2020, following the initiative of the UK’s […]