![Privacypandemics Banner 1200x545blue](https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/PrivacyPandemics_Banner_1200x545blue.png)
Call for Position Statements on Responsible Uses of Technology and Health Data During Times of Crisis
Event Overview The Future of Privacy Forum, in collaboration with the National Science Foundation, Duke Sanford School of Public Policy, SFI ADAPT Research Centre, Dublin City University, and Intel Corporation presents Privacy & Pandemics: Responsible Uses of Technology and Health Data During Times of Crisis — An International Tech and Data Conference, including a two day […]
![Washington State Capitol](https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/State-Capital-Washington-scaled.jpg)
FPF Presents Expert Analysis to Washington State Lawmakers as Multiple States Weigh COVID-19 Privacy and Contact Tracing Legislation
In response to the ongoing public health emergency, over the past few months state legislatures in the United States have diverted their resources towards establishing state and local reopening plans, allocating federal aid, and promoting public trust and public participation by addressing concerns over privacy and civil liberties. Many states have introduced bills which […]
![post image](https://fpf.org/wp-content/themes/fpf/img/post.png)
Best Practices
Future of Privacy Forum’s Best Practices page is a central repository for privacy-related guidance documents, reports, codes of conduct, and other resources that can help you navigate complex issues and implement initiatives in privacy-protective ways.
![Delhi City Pin On The Map](https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/iss_7018_05258-1-scaled.jpg)
India: Proposed Data Regulation Overhaul Includes New Draft Rules for Processing Non-Personal Data
Authors: Sameer Avasarala ——- Disclaimers This guest post is by Sameer Avasarala, a Data Protection and Technology Lawyer in Bengaluru. The material/opinion expressed is exclusively that of the author alone and does not expresses the views of Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas or any other firm / organization that the author is associated with. He can be […]
![Quentin Headshot2](https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/quentin-headshot2.jpg)
Quentin Palfrey
![Screen Shot 2020 07 30 At 10.09.43 Am 1200x545](https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Screen-Shot-2020-07-30-at-10.09.43-AM-1200x545-1.png)
FPF Releases Follow-Up Report on Consumer Genetics Companies and Practice of Transparency Reporting
Today, the Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) published “Consumer Genetic Testing Companies & The Role of Transparency Reports in Revealing Government Requests for User Data,” examining how leading consumer genetic testing companies require valid legal processes before disclosing consumer genetic information to the government, as well as how companies publish transparency reports around such disclosures. […]
![Us Capitol Building 2225764 1920](https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/us-capitol-building-2225764_1920.jpg)
11th Annual Privacy Papers for Policymakers — Call for Nominations
The Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) invites privacy scholars and authors with an interest in privacy issues to nominate finished papers for consideration for FPF’s annual Privacy Papers for Policymakers Award. PURPOSE To recognize the year’s leading privacy research and analytical work that is relevant to policymakers in the United States Congress, at U.S. federal […]
![2 Dna](https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2_dna.jpg)
California SB 980 Would Codify Many of FPF’s Best Practices for Consumer Genetic Testing Services, but Key Differences Remain
Authors: John Verdi (Vice President of Policy) and Katelyn Ringrose (Christopher Wolf Diversity Law Fellow) In July 2018, the Future of Privacy Forum released Privacy Best Practices for Consumer Genetic Testing Services. FPF developed the Best Practices following consultation with technical experts, regulators, leading consumer genetic and personal genomic testing companies, and civil society. The […]