Search results

THE STATE OF STATE AI Legislative Approaches to AI in 2025 OCTOBER 2025 • SUPPLEMENTAL The Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) is a non-profit organization that serves as a catalyst for privacy leadership and scholarship, advancing principled data practices in support of emerging technologies. Learn more about FPF by visiting fpf.org . Justine Gluck Policy […]

NORTH CAROLINA JOURNAL OF LAW & TECHNOLOGY VOLUME 19, ISSUE 1: OCTOBER 2017 125 TAMING THE GOLEM: CHALLENGES OF ETHICAL ALGORITHMIC DECISION-MAKING Omer Tene & Jules Polonetsky* The prospect of digital manipulation on major online platforms reached fever pitch in the last election cycle in the United States. Jonathan Zittrain’s concern about “digital gerrymandering” found […]

building,of,congress,and,the,fountain,in,buenos,aires,,argentina

On September 7, a trial judge declared the implementation of the Fugitive Facial Recognition System (SRFP, for its name in Spanish) by the Government of the City of Buenos Aires unconstitutional. The decision set an important precedent for risks associated with privacy and intimacy in public spaces in the context of public surveillance for law […]

FPF welcomes two new Senior Fellows to the Global team that will provide ad-hoc insight into the state of play of data protection and privacy law developments in their regions: Pablo Palazzi for Latin America, with a focus on Argentina, and Takeshige Sugimoto for Japan. Pablo Palazzi Pablo A. Palazzi, who will oversee developments in Argentina […]

Copyright © 2011 Lockstep Consulting Pty Ltd 1 Lockstep AusCERT 2011 Identities Evolve (1.1).docx Identities Evolve Why federated identity is easier said than done Stephen Wilson Lockstep Consulting Pty Ltd, Australia [email protected] AusCERT 2011 Conference: “Overexposed” May 2011, Gold Coast, Austra lia Abstract Why does digital identity turn out to be such a hard problem? […]

          Gutting the Privacy Act:  Agency use of Systems of Records Notices (SORNs)           Wordcount: 13,831 with footnotes              “By requiring open rule making with the receipt of  comments and an agency statement  explaining the exception for certain categories of  records, the Congress was trying to  avoid creation of a loophole which would permit ent ire agencies to avoid compliance  with the Act.” 1     “The agency’s broad interpretation would bring thro ugh the back door a provision  expressly omitted from the Act as approved by Congr ess and signed into law.” 2                                                        1 James H. Davidson,  The Privacy Act of 1974—Exceptions and Exemptions , 34 F ED . BAR  J. 279 (1975),  available in  L EGISLATIVE  HISTORY OF THE  PRIVACY  ACT OF  1974, S OURCE  BOOK ON  PRIVACY , 1191, 1193  (1976) [hereinafter Davidson  Privacy Act].  2 Vymetalik v. F.B.I. , 785 F.2d 1090, 1095 (C.A.D.C. 1986).        […]

Transferring Personal Data in Asia : A path to legal certainty and regional convergence This Comparative Review sets out proposals for how Asian public stakeholders may promote legal certainty and greater consistency between the ir respective laws and regulation s on cross -border transfers of personal data in the region. Despite differences between the philosophies […]

1 Comparative Table of Laws and Regulations on Cross -Border Personal Data Flows in Asia (W orking Document , May 2 8, 2020 ) P R E S E N TA T I O N This document consists in a comparative Table on the Laws and Regulations relative to cross -border transfers of personal data […]