Search results

[…] Privacy Law in the Age of the “Electronic Sweatshop,” 28 J. MARSHALL L. REV . 139 (1994); Ray Lewis, Employee E -mail Privacy Still Unemployed: What the United States Can Learn from the United Kingdom , 67 LA. L. REV . 959 (2007); Larry O. Natt Gantt, II, An Affront to Human Dignity: Electronic […]

[…] alternative term, “personal information,” quite frequently and sometimes interchangeably with PII. 56 Shattuck, In the Shadow of 1984: National Ident ification Systems, Computer-Matching and Privacy in the United States , 35 H ASTINGS L.J. 991 , 991 (1984) (observing how recent actions by the federal government had “brought the technology invasion from the realm […]

[…] App. 1984); Virgil v. Time, 527 F.2d 1122 (9th Cir. 1975); Neff v. Time, Inc., 406 F. Supp. 858 (W.D. Pa. 1976). 4 See, e.g., Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967); Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979); Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405 (2005). 5 See, e.g., Michael Bergman, The Deep […]

[…] but  the  court  of  appeals  affirmed  the  lower  court’s  decision  to  gran t  the  defendants  summary  judgment.  In  the  court’s  assessment,  *945  the  plaintiff’s  actions  in  the  United  States  had  r endered  her  identity  “open to the public eye.”  [FN85]       Fisher  v  Ohio  Department  of  Rehabilitation  and  Corr ection  [FN86]   completes  the  trilogy  of  […]

[…] trackers in order to raise revenue through advertising and affiliate links. Similarly, anyone operating a business in Europe but is directing their sales and services to the United States, in particular CA consumers, there is a threshold of 50,000 more consumer information being collected and annual gross revenue numbers – it just matters that […]

[…] Laws Reduce Identity Theft? Sasha Romanosky, Rahul Telang, Alessandro Acquisti Heinz School of Public Policy and Management Carnegie Mellon University {sromanos, rtelang, acquisti} @andrew.cmu.edu ABSTRACT In the United States, identity theft resulted in co rporate and consumer losses of $56 billion dollars in 2005, with up to 30 percent of k nown identity thefts […]

[…] ser ve  a  legitimate  and  compelling  govern ment  interest  and  its  methodology  must  be  sufficiently  accurate  a nd  narrowly  tai-                                                                                                                           21  See   United States v. Playboy Entm’t Group, Inc., 529 U .S. 803, 816–17 (2000); Katz v.  United  States,  389  U.S.  347,  353,  357–58  (1967)  (es tablishing  reasonable  expectation  of  privacy  test  for  Fourth  Amendment).  This  distinctio n  has  some  relevance  to  […]

[…] confidential information provided by evidentiary privi- leges were recognized in early American cases as well. In the first quarter of the nineteenth century, state courts in the United States recognized England’s attorney-client privilege and spousal privileges. 63 Thus in 1811, a Pennsylvania court declared: The general rule is that every person not infamous or […]

[…] capacity for critical reflection and to repress any social movements outside their control.”); Paul M. Schwartz, Privacy and Participation: Personal Information and Public Sector Regulation in the United States, 80 I OWA L. R EV. 553, 560 (1995); Peter P. Swire, Financial Privacy and the Theory of High-Tech Government Surveillance, 77 W ASH . […]

[…] Mill’s On Liberty , studied for its discussion of liberty at large in the American polis, makes the fine distinction that our own privacy law in the United States currently struggles to recognize: “But there is a sphere of action in which society, as distinguished from the individual, has, if any, only an indirect […]