Search results

[…] Scott became the first governor to veto a comprehensive consumer privacy bill. That bill, H.121, was an omnibus privacy bill with comprehensive protections and an age-appropriate design code. Had that bill been enacted, the comprehensive privacy provisions would have been amongst some of the broadest and most stringent in the country. In particular, the […]

[…] Both New York and California have passed laws prohibiting online services from providing algorithmically curated feeds to minors without parental consent; South Carolina and Nebraska’s age-appropriate design code laws require services to offer an opt-out of personalized recommender systems. The full report, including an appendix tracking a sample of enacted and proposed youth online […]

Personalization—the use of personal data to tailor content and services to individual users—sits at the center of today’s most contested debates about youth and digital technology. This report provides a comprehensive framework for understanding personalization in youth online experiences, examining its mechanisms, benefits, risks, mitigations, and the emerging legislative and regulatory landscape.

[…] no longer representative of who that person is. Content Exposure and Amplification Use of algorithmic ranking and recommender systems that utilize a user’s personal data to suggest, promote, or rank content. This content includes material from other users, hashtags, and other media. May contribute to the formation of “filter bubbles,” which can limit exposure […]

[…] Rule on Bulk Sensitive Data. By bridging the gap between policy and technical, this session provides a space to trade emerging thoughts on the practicalities of meeting today’s fragmented regulatory standards. KEY DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 1. Operationalizing Broad Definitions: How are organizations technically executing data segmentation to account for broad definitions of “consumer health data” […]

[…] federal comprehensive privacy law more likely to pass? What issues are most ripe for agreement? 2. Legislative Trends : What is going on in state privacy legislation today that’s most worrying and disruptive to your business? Data minimization? Bans on selling sensitive data? Opt-in consent requirements? Data-driven pricing restrictions? How and why? 3. Inconsistent […]

[…] audit or assessment Employment AI gets its turn in SB 5, with new transparency requirements for automated employment-related decision technologies (AEDTs) used to shape decisions about hiring, promotion, discipline, and discharge. The section draws from broader ADMT laws, including California’s CPPA ADMT regulations, the Colorado AI Act as originally enacted in 2024, as well […]

[…] for any reason other than to establish a discounted price for a consumer good or service as part of an online transaction, and who (online) advertises or promotes the price, labels a consumer good with the price, or publishes a statement, image, or announcement disclosing the price. These requirements include providing a mandated disclosure […]

[…] for individual customers. 15 Most commonly, pricing is personalized in the form of targeted discounts or loyalty programs. In the case of targe ted discounts, retailers offer promotions based on a customer’s behavioral or demographic information, such as providing coupons to consumers after their first visit to a retail website, or sending direct-mail coupons […]

[…] and understand the student privacy requirements. (For more on training, see the section below on Continued Privacy Training). ADMINISTRATIVE RULE (RULE R277-487-3) Rule 277-487 in Utah’s Administrative Code mandates that each LEA must provide the State Board with the LEA’s data governance plan, and the name and contact information of the LEA’s designated data […]