Search results

[…] California voters expanded the law via a ballot initiative to further establish privacy requirements for businesses, seeking to incorporate protections inspired by the GDPR. 10 In 2021, Virginia passed legislation with similarities to the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), enhanced by consent require- ments for sensitive data but greater flexibility for advertising. 11 Massachusetts, […]

[…] 2002 (discussing a settlementbetween the attorneys general of nine states (Arizona, California, Connecticut, Massachusetts,Michigan, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Vermont, and Washington) and DoubleClickwhereby the company promised not to use certain pieces of PII obtained from cookies in placingweb-based advertisements).38.Web beacons are also commonly referred to as web bugs, clear gifs, and pixel […]

[…] Widow Sues Over Film, Sept. 22, 2007, available at http://www.washingtonpost.com!wp.dynlcontentlartide/2007/09/22/AR2007092�200801. html (last visited May 9, 2008). ‘1 298 PRIVACY: THE LOST RIGHT and included another, “Free text virgin to virgin;’ beneath her photo. Virgin Mobile likely benefited from using the plaintiff’s image in its advertising campaign. And because the photograph was chosen to be […]

Privacy Papers for Policy Makers 2009-2010 Cover The publication of “Privacy Papers for Policy Makers” was supported by AT&T, LexisNexis, Microsoft and Procter & Gamble Inside front cover September 15, 2010 We are delighted to provide you with this Journal featuring works selected by the Future of Privacy Forum Advisory Board as the best “Privacy […]

Privacy Papers for Policy Makers 2011 Cover The publication of “Privacy Papers for Policy Makers” was supported by AT&T and Microsoft. Inside front cover September 7, 2011 We are delighted to provide you with the second annual compilation entitled “Privacy Papers for Policy Makers,” showcasing leading analytical thinking about current and emerging privacy issues. The […]

1 To Track or “Do Not Track”: Advancing Transparency and =ndividual Control in Online Behavioral Advertising Omer Tene 1 and Jules Polonetsky 2 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ………………………….. ………………………….. ………………………….. ……………………….. 2 2. Online tracking devices ………………………….. ………………………….. ………………………….. ……….. 3 2.1. Cookies ………………………….. ………………………….. ………………………….. ………………………….. 4 2.2. Flash Cookies ………………………….. ………………………….. ………………………….. […]

harvard Privacy is one ofthe most important concepts ofour time, yetitis also oneofthe most elusive. Asrapidly changing technology makes information increasingly available, scholars, activists, andpolicymakers have struggled todefine privacy, withmany con- ceding thatthetask isvirtually impossible. In this concise andlucid book, Daniel J. Solove offers acomprehensive overviewofthe difficulties involvedindiscussions ofprivacy and ultimately providesaprovocative resolu- tion. Heargues […]

Future of Privacy Forum ■ 919 18 th Street, NW, Suite 901 ■ Washington, DC 20006 www.futureofprivacy.org April 20, 2015 National Telecommunications and Information Administration U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Room 4725 Washington, DC 20230 Re: UAS RFC 2015 Dear Mr. Verdi: The Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) is a think tank […]

Draft June 16 , 2011 Forthcoming 114 West Virginia Law R eview * Assistant Professor, University of Louisville, Louis D. Brandeis School of Law; J.D., University of Michigan. The author extends thanks to the many scholars who helped with this piece. The author cannot overstate her appreciation for Nancy Levit ‘s review of earlier […]

[…] –  conspicuousl y  and  clearly.    The  FIP  of  choice  deals with visitor control over the collection, use and dissemination of  their PII. 71  This discussion must  include  a  discussion  of  control  over  PII  utilized  in  a  manner  different   then  promised  upon  collection.   Describing choice-related privacy provisions is important bec ause visitors are less likely to perceive PII  •  identification of the uses to which the data will b e put [Choice];   •  identification of any potential recipients of the d ata [Choice];   •  the  nature  of  the  data  collected  and  the  means  by  w hich  it  is  collected  […]