Search results

1/25: states-v19.docx The Seven States of Data: When is Pseudonymous Data Not Personal Information ? Khaled El Emam 1, Eloise Gratton 2, Jules Polonetsky 3, Luk Arbuckle 4 1 University of Ottawa & Privacy Analytics Inc. 2 Borden Ladner Gervais LLP 3 Future of Privacy Forum 4 Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute [FINAL […]

Privacy above all other Fundamental Rights? Challenges with the Implementation of a Right to be Forgotten in Canada* Eloïse Gratton** and Jules Polonetsky* ** Executive Summary This paper explores whether importing a “right to be forgotten” (RTBF) that would allow individuals to stop data search engines or other third parties, from providing links to information […]

Always On: Privacy Implications of Microphone-Enabled Devices BY STACEY GRAY APRIL 2016 In collaboration with 2 ALWAYS ON: PRIVACY IMPLICATIONS OF MICROPHONE-ENABLED DEVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ……………………………………………………………… ……………………………………………………………………………………….. …………. 3 I. Advances in Speech Recognition ……………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………. 4 II. Recent Privacy Concerns Sparked by Microphone-Enabled Devices ……………………………………………………………… …………….. 4 III. Distinguishing Between Active and […]

December 18, 2015 1 US Surveillance Law, Safe Harbor, and Reforms Since 2013 Peter Swire1 Executive Summary: This White Paper is a submission to the Belgian Privacy Authority for its December 18, 2015 Forum on “The Consequences of the Judgment in the Schrems Case.”2 The Forum discusses the decision by the European Court of Justice […]

December’17,’2015”1’US#Surveillance#Law,#Safe#Harbor,#and#Reforms#Since#2013##Peter#Swire1##Executive#Summary:#’This’ White’ Paper’ is’ a’ submission’ to’ the’ Belgian’ Privacy’ Authority’ for’ its’December’ 18,’ 2015′ Forum’ on’ “The’ Consequences’ of’ the’ Judgment’ in’ the’Schrems’Case.”2”The’ Forum’ discusses’ the’ decision’ by’ the’ European’ Court’ of’ Justice’ in’Schrems(v.(Data(Protection(Commissioner3’that’ the’ EU/US’ Safe’ Harbor’ was’ unlawful’under’ the’ EU’ Data’ Protection’ Directive,’ particularly’ due’ to’ concerns’ about’ US’surveillance’law.”For’the’Forum,’I’have’been’asked’to’comment’on’two’issues:”’1)Is’ US’ surveillance’ law’ […]

At today’s FCBA brown bag lunch, FCC Enforcement Bureau Chief Travis LeBlanc discussed the Commission’s recent entrance into privacy enforcement and fielded questions as to what companies might do to avoid running afoul of the Enforcement Bureau. LeBlanc emphasized the innovation continues to outpace regulators, noting that much of the Commission’s investigative and enforcement work […]

T HE C O NNE C TE D C AR AND P R I VA CY N A VI GA TI NG N E W D A T A I S S UES TH E C O N N E C T E D C A R A N D P R I V A […]

October 15, 2014 via email : [email protected] Ms. Diane Honeycutt Secretary Computer Security Division National Institute of Standards and Technology 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8930 Gaithersburg, MD 20899 Re: Public Comments, NIST Privacy Engineering Workshop Dear Ms. Honeycutt: The Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) is a think tank seeking to advance responsible data practices and […]

Benefit-Risk Analysis for Big Data Projects Jules Polonetsky Omer Tene Joseph Jerome Benefit-Risk Analysis for Big Data Projects Jules Polonetsky Omer Tene Joseph Jerome September 201b About the Future of Privacy Forum Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) is a Washington, DC based think tank that seeks to advance responsible data practices. The forum is led […]

Future of Privacy Forum  919 18 th Street, NW, Suite 9 01  Washington, DC 20006 www.futureofprivacy.org August 5, 2014 Via e -mail: [email protected] National Telecommunications and Information Administration U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Avenue N.W., Room 4725 Washington, DC 20230 Re: Privacy RFC 2014 The Future of Priv acy Forum (FPF) is […]