Search results

Following the enactment of India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 (DPDPA), the Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) and nasscom (National Association of Software and Service Companies), India’s largest industry association for the information technology sector, co-hosted a 2-part webinar series focused on the consent-centric regime under the DPDP Act. Spread across two days (November […]

As 2023 comes to an end, we want to reflect on a year that saw the Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) continue to expand its presence globally and domestically while organizing engaging events, publishing thought-provoking analysis, providing the latest expert updates, and more. FPF continues to convene industry experts, academics, consumer advocates, and other experts […]

On October 27, 2023, the Future of Privacy Forum (“FPF”), in partnership with the UNSW Allens Hub for Technology, Law and Innovation (“Allens Hub”), convened a multidisciplinary meeting of experts on technology, privacy, safety, and security in Sydney, NSW, Australia to discuss benefits, challenges, and unanswered questions associated with the Australian eSafety Commissioner’s (“eSafety”) forthcoming […]

DECEMBER 2023 A Conversation on Privacy, Safety, and Security in Australia: Themes and Takeaways The Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) is a non-profit organization that serves as a catalyst for privacy leadership and scholarship, advancing principled data practices in support of emerging technologies. Learn more about FPF by visiting fpf.org. AUTHORED BY Amie Stepanovich Vice […]

australia report

australia report

Australia Security Salon

EU AIA Conformity Assessment: A step-by-step guide Step 1 Am I obligated to perform a CA? Q1 Do I fall under the AIA? YES Q2 Is it a ‘high-risk’AI system? YES Q3 Am I the provider? YES NO Material scope: Art 2 Is it an ‘AI system’ as per Art 3(1)? See Table 1 Classification of High-risk AI systems under the AIA AI systems that are safety components of products  or are themselves products that fall under Annex II AI Systems that belong to the use cases of Annex III  + (EC) the output of the system is not  purely accessory & is likely to lead to significant  risks / (EP) significant risk of harm. NO Article 3(e) product manufacturer / distributor / importer /  user / third-party responsible to perform the CA Step 2 When to perform a CA? EX ANTE Before placing the AI system on the EU market or putting it into service (definitions in Art 3(9,11)) EX POST IF Afer placing the AI system on the EU market or putting it into service: Substantial modification to the AI system• NEW AI system • NEW CA required IF reasons of public security or the protection of life and health of  persons, environmental protection, and the protection of key industrial  and infrastructural assets  high-risk AI system placed on the market without a prior CA. (Art 47) Continued overleaf AI system that continues to learn +  pre-determined changes documented  in the initial CA no new CA required. 1200 Abernathy Rd NE, Building 600 | Atlanta, Georgia | United States | 30328 Atlanta | London | Bangalore | Melbourne | Denver| Seattle | San Francisco | New York | São Paulo | Munich | Paris | Hong Kong | Bangkok As society redefines risk and opportunity, OneTrust empowers tomorrow’s leaders to succeed through trust and impact with the Trust Intelligence Platform. The market-defining Trust  Intelligence Platform from OneTrust connects privacy, GRC, ethics, and ESG teams, data, and processes, so all companies can collaborate seamlessly and put trust at the center of their  […]

Data Sharing for Research CASE STUDY AIMS Collaboratory Executive Summary The Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) analyzed a diverse sample of data sharing partnerships between companies and academic researchers and produced a series of case studies distilling our findings. We learned that there is broad consensus regarding the potential benefits of industry/academic data sharing partnerships, […]