Search results

About fifty years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court decided a case that would provide the basis for federal privacy protections for reproductive health decisions. The importance of protecting reproductive information and choice, particularly where abortion was concerned, was the basis for Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), which provided women and […]

[…] impacted (Article 16(2)(c));  Apply the risk-management requirements iteratively and throughout the lifecycle of AI systems (Article 16(2)(d));   Include monitoring for risks and adverse impacts (Article 16(2)(e)); Include documentation of risks, actual and potential impacts, and on the risk management approach (Article 16(2)(f)); Require testing of artificial intelligence systems before making them available for first […]

The Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) Center for Artificial Intelligence released a newly updated version of our Generative AI internal compliance document – Generative AI for Organizational Use: Internal Policy Considerations, with new content addressing organizations’ ongoing responsibilities, specific concerns (e.g., high-risk uses), and lessons taken from recent regulatory enforcement related to these technologies. In 2023, […]

Today, the Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) Center for Artificial Intelligence is releasing a newly updated version of our Generative AI internal compliance document – Generative AI for Organizational Use: Internal Policy Considerations, with new content addressing organizations’ ongoing responsibilities, specific concerns (e.g., high-risk uses), and lessons taken from recent regulatory enforcement related to these technologies. […]

[…] should include an identifier of the service or model that created the content, but need not include user information. Organizations should also endeavor to develop tools or APIs to allow users to determine if particular content was created with their advanced AI system such as via watermarks. Organizations are further encouraged to implement other […]

On May 19, 2024, the Minnesota Legislature passed HF 4757, an omnibus budget bill that includes the Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act (MNCDPA). The bill now heads to Governor Walz for signature. Developed by State Representative Steve Elkins over nearly five years and multiple legislative sessions, the MNCDPA is among the strongest iterations of the […]

Authors: Maria Badillo and Momina Imran Today, the Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) published an Issue Brief analyzing the regulatory strategies and priorities of data protection authorities (DPAs) in Latin America. Titled Regulatory Strategies and Priorities of Data Protection Authorities in Latin America: 2024 and Beyond, the Issue Brief outlines an overview of the various […]

[…] to avoid algorithmic discrimination and issue a public statement regarding the use or sale of high-risk AI systems. Developers would also need to provide certain disclosures and documentation to deployers, including information regarding intended use, data used to train the system and risk mitigation measures. Deployers would be required to maintain a risk management […]

On April 6, the Maryland Senate concurred with House amendments to SB 541, the Maryland Online Data Privacy Act (MODPA), sending the bill to Governor Moore for signature. If enacted, MODPA could be a paradigm-shifting addition to the state privacy law landscape. While recent state comprehensive privacy laws generally have added to the existing landscape […]

[…] 22 of the final version of the Measures defines “providers” as companies that offer services using generative AI technologies, including those offered through application programming interfaces ( APIs). It also defines “users” as organizations and individuals that use generative AI services to generate content.  The Measures adopt a more relaxed stance on generative AI […]