Search results

DECEMBER 2023 A Conversation on Privacy, Safety, and Security in Australia: Themes and Takeaways The Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) is a non-profit organization that serves as a catalyst for privacy leadership and scholarship, advancing principled data practices in support of emerging technologies. Learn more about FPF by visiting fpf.org. AUTHORED BY Amie Stepanovich Vice […]

Organizations building immersive technologies like extended reality and virtual worlds often rely on large amounts of data about individuals’ bodies and behaviors. While body-related data allows for new, positive applications in health, education, entertainment, and more, it can also raise privacy and safety risks. FPF’s Risk Framework for Body-Related Data in Immersive Technologies helps organizations seeking to […]

Today, the Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) released its Risk Framework for Body-Related Data in Immersive Technologies for organizations to structure the collection, use, and onward transfer of body-related data.  Organizations building immersive technologies like extended reality and virtual worlds often rely on large amounts of data about individuals’ bodies and behaviors. While body-related data […]

[…] body movement data) › Purchased or obtained from another party (e.g., a third-party application receiving user data from a first-party platform through an application programming interface, or API) Additionally, the interfaces common in immersive technologies—such as XR headsets or wearable S TAG E 3 20 RISK FRAMEWORK FOR BODYRELATED DATA IN IMMERSIVE TECHNOLOGIES | […]

In the summer of 2021, FPF announced our participation in a collaborative project with researchers from the Pennsylvania State University and the University of Michigan to develop and build a searchable database of privacy policies and other privacy-related documents, with the support of the National Science Foundation. This project, PrivaSeer, has since become an evolving, […]

document,management,system,(dms),being,setup,by,it,consultant,working

тАЬV er if ia bly s a fe тАЭ p r oces sin g o f c h il d ren тАЩs p er so n a l da ta u n der t h e D PD PA 2 0 23 : A C a ta lo g o f M ea su r […]

[…] the proposed EU AIA. It does not offer a comparative study with other existing assessment processes required under other European legal acts. The EU AIA includes various documentation obligations. We will refer to those obligations only where necessary, to either highlight their differences from the CA or explain where those other documentation obligations play […]

[…] NEW AI system • NEW CA required IF reasons of public security or the protection of life and health of  persons, environmental protection, and the protection of key industrial  and infrastructural assets  high-risk AI system placed on the market without a prior CA. (Art 47) Continued overleaf AI system that continues to learn +  pre-determined changes documented  in the initial CA no new CA required. 1200 Abernathy Rd NE, Building 600 | Atlanta, Georgia | United States | 30328 Atlanta | London | Bangalore | Melbourne | Denver| Seattle | San Francisco | New York | São Paulo | Munich | Paris | Hong Kong | Bangkok As society redefines risk and opportunity, OneTrust empowers tomorrow’s leaders to succeed through trust and impact with the Trust Intelligence Platform. The market-defining Trust  Intelligence Platform from OneTrust connects privacy, GRC, ethics, and ESG teams, data, and processes, so all companies can collaborate seamlessly and put trust at the center of their  operations and culture by unlocking their value and potential to thrive by doing what’s good for people and the planet. Copyright © 2023 Future of Privacy Forum and OneTrust LLC.   Please contact Future of Privacy Forum or OneTrust for questions about commercial use of this publication. Step 3 What body is conducting the CA? INTERNAL CA THIRD-PARTY CA PROVIDER (or any other responsible actor) NOTIFIED BODY (NB) ANNEX VI AIA – Quality Management System (Art 17) – Technical  documentation (Art 11) and verification of  compliance with the Requirements of Title III, Chapter 2 – Design & development process is  consistent with the technical documentation – Post-market monitoring (Art 61) is  consistent with the technical documentation ANNEX VII AIA – Assesses the Quality Management System (Art 17) – Assessed the Technical documentation (Art 11) Provider submits two applications to the NB 1. For the QMS 2. For the TD NB: Assesses the application Communicates the results to the Provider: The high-risk AI system is in conformity with  the Requirements NB issues an EU technical  documentation assessment certificate 1. Draws up EU declaration of conformity (Annex V AIA) 2. Afxes the CE Marking The high-risk AI system is not in  conformity with the Requirements Step 4 Assess conformity with all requirements for high-risk AI systems 4 […]

T estimony – David Sallay, Future of Privacy Forum H . 532 /S.280 An Act R elative to S tudent and E ducator D ata P rivacy Joint C ommittee o n Education October 30, 2023 1pm ET Good afternoon and thank you for the opportunity to testify before you regarding bill H . 532 […]