Search results

[…] and ownership of Banco Popular instruments. Those deemed eligible could then submit comments through an online form. More than 23,000 comments were received, each assigned an alphanumeric code. In June 2019, the SRB transferred 1,104 comments relevant to the valuation to Deloitte via a secure server. Deloitte never received the underlying identification data or […]

[…] its reform may be announced without public consultation. The text of the GDPR is finely-balanced, and changes to one provision that on the surface seem minor may create uncertainties or conflicts with other provisions, unless they are carefully considered. Pushing through reforms hastily can lead to unintended consequences that exacerbate existing problems and increase […]

[…] Chart: Risk Assessment (DPIA) Requirements in California, Colorado, and the EU California Colorado EU FPF Analysis: CA v. CO References California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.185, subd. (a)(15) Colorado Privacy Act (CPA) Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-1-1309 General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Article 35 This comparison chart focuses on the […]

[…] enacted.1 While other trackers estimated that more than 1,000 AI-related bills were introduced this year, FPF’s methodology applies a narrower lens, focusing on measures most likely to create direct compliance implications for private-sector AI developers and deployers.2 Key Takeaways State lawmakers moved away from sweeping frameworks regulating AI, towards narrower, transparency-driven approaches. Three key […]

cyberspace,technology,with,blue,digital,light,patterns,,creating,a,futuristic

[…] of SB 53, a central question is whether RAISE will be amended to more closely align with the California law. To help stakeholders track these dynamics, we’ve created a side-by-side comparison of the two bills. Broadly, SB 53 is more detailed in content—requiring frameworks, transparency reports, and whistleblower protections—while RAISE is stricter in enforcement, […]

[…] Suppliers of chatbots used for mental health must disclose information to users and avoid in- interaction advertising. They have an affirmative defense if they document properly and create a detailed safeguard policy. KEY BILLS THAT PASSED AT LEAST ONE CHAMBER California SB 238 Sen. Smallwood- Cuevas (D) Employment Would require an employer to annually […]

[…] or indirectly affect private-sector AI development and deployment. By concentrating on industry-facing legislation (rather than hundreds of additional bills that only reference AI in passing, update criminal codes, support workforce training or establish task forces), this report highlights the measures most likely to create compliance implications for companies developing or deploying AI systems. Only […]

[…] enacted.1 While other trackers estimated that more than 1,000 AI-related bills were introduced this year, FPF’s methodology applies a narrower lens, focusing on measures most likely to create direct compliance implications for private-sector AI developers and deployers.2 Key Takeaways State lawmakers moved away from sweeping frameworks regulating AI, towards narrower, transparency-driven approaches. Three key […]

Conversational AI technologies are hyper-personalizing. Across sectors, companies are focused on offering personalized experiences that are tailored to users’ preferences, behaviors, and virtual and physical environments. These range from general purpose LLMs, to the rapidly growing market for LLM-powered AI companions, educational aides, and corporate assistants. There are clear trends among this overall focus: towards […]