Search results

[…] FPF CEO, and Takeshige Sugimoto, Managing Partner at S&K Brussels LPC and FPF Senior Fellow, hosted the Symposium.  The G7 DPA Agenda, built on three pillars: Data Free Flow with Trust, emerging technologies, and enforcement cooperation The DPAs of the G7 nations started to meet annually in 2020, following the initiative of the UK’s […]

[…] for Teens The DPDPA forbids covered entities from selling or processing for targeted advertising purposes the data of consumers that the controller knows, or willfully disregards, are between the ages of 13 and 17 without consent. This prohibition goes farther than similarly-structured prohibitions in California, Connecticut, and Montana, which place restrictions on the sale […]

[…] a data protection impact assessment (DPIA) prior to the processing of personal data, where such processing may likely result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of a data subject. The Act does not specify the period within which a DPIA must be conducted prior to such processing. Laws such as Kenya’s […]

[…] 2023) to adopt broad-based data privacy legislation governing the collection, use, and transfer of consumer data. The bulk of OCPA’s requirements will take effect on July 1, 2024 (with a July 1, 2025 effective date for nonprofit organizations). OCPA is the product of a multi-year stakeholder task force held under the auspices of Attorney […]

[…] their rights and obligations fairly and efficiently depends on various factors, such as the resources available to them and the presence of asymmetric information among them. To better direct this “private ordering” with significant social implications, the EU has planned to create non-binding standard contractual clauses based on each party’s level of control in […]

[…] Governor Lombardo, making Nevada the second state, after Washington, to pass broad-based consumer health data privacy legislation this session. The act will take effect on March 31, 2024. The Washington ‘My Health, My Data’ Act (MHMD), which was enacted on April 27, 2023, established a first-of-its-kind, comprehensive framework within U.S. law for the protection […]

[…] features, including a mechanism to report “harmful or unwanted” behavior. The children’s and health provisions of SB 3 appear to be informed by the California Age-Appropriate Design Code (AADC) and the recently enacted Washington State My Health, My Data Act, respectively, but contain numerous important distinctions.  FPF has prepared a comparison chart to help […]

[…] owners to demonstrate their claims about the performance of their AI systems. Second, an organization’s use of AI Verify does not guarantee that tested AI systems are free from risks or biases, nor that they  are completely “safe” or “ethical.” Third, AI Verify is intended to preclude organizations from unintentionally divulging sensitive information from […]

[…] to the Privacy Act in 28 distinct areas, based on feedback from the public and private sectors, civil society, and academia in response to the issues paper. Between January 2022 and February 2023, the AGD considered feedback on the discussion paper and convened roundtables and consultations with stakeholders on specific issues. Overview of the […]

[…] (COPPA). Unlike the California and Connecticut privacy laws, which created heightened opt-in rights for teens aged 13 to 15, SB 262 does not include any further distinctions between young children and teens, suggesting that parents or guardians will have sole responsibility to exercise consumer rights on behalf of youth up to age 18. 4. […]