Search results

[…] at Pfizer, she was a member of the companies’ AI Council, Bioethics Advisory Council, and Digital Policy Group, and co-chaired the Pfizer Women’s Resource Group in the New York headquarters. She also serves on the AI Governance Advisory Board at the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP), where she is also an IAPP Westin […]

[…] (FPF) Center for Artificial Intelligence is releasing a newly updated version of our Generative AI internal compliance document – Generative AI for Organizational Use: Internal Policy Considerations, with new content addressing organizations’ ongoing responsibilities, specific concerns (e.g., high-risk uses), and lessons taken from recent regulatory enforcement related to these technologies. Last year, FPF published a […]

[…] a core part of our identity. We are a trusted convener positioned to build bridges between stakeholders globally, and we will continue to do so under the new Center for AI, which will sit within FPF.” The Center will help the organization’s 220+ members navigate AI through the development of best practices, research, legislative […]

[…] after the popular Connecticut privacy framework, it goes further in many places, drawing inspiration from a variety of sources. Vermont adds data minimization provisions inspired by Maryland’s new privacy law, new digital civil rights protections pulled from the American Data Privacy and Protection Act, a trimmed-down Age-Appropriate Design Code (AADC) focused on design features, […]

[…] Asia-Pacific.” This report examines the current state of governance frameworks for generative AI systems in five countries in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region: Australia, China, Japan, Singapore, and South Korea. The key takeaways of the report include:  A comparison of regulatory responses to generative AI across the APAC region, including details about China’s unique approach […]

[…] a controller has actual knowledge of, or willfully disregards, that individual is younger than 13—as sensitive data, requiring opt-in consent for processing. Some states, like Oregon and New Jersey, have started adding additional protections for teenagers by changing opt-out rights to opt-ins, and Minnesota follows that trend: For targeted advertising and sale of personal […]

‘Don’t call me kid, don’t call me baby’ – unless you are a child residing in either Colorado or Virginia, where children will soon have increased privacy protections due to recent advances in youth privacy legislation. Virginia and Colorado both have broad-based privacy laws already in effect. During the 2024 state legislative sessions, both […]

On May 17, Governor Polis signed the Colorado AI Act (CAIA) (SB-205) into law, establishing new individual rights and protections with respect to high-risk artificial intelligence systems. Building off the work of existing best practices and prior legislative efforts, the CAIA is the first comprehensive United States law to explicitly establish guardrails against discriminatory […]

[…] more online services should be concerned about compliance with kids’ and teens’ privacy protections. Constructive knowledge standards may cause general audience service providers to be included in new legal obligations and, therefore, increase the likelihood of a company implementing age gates and age assurance methods for the use of its online services. Constructive knowledge […]

[…] is currently awaiting action from Governor Moore. While FPF has already written about Maryland’s potentially “paradigm-shifting” state comprehensive privacy law, the Maryland AADC may similarly pioneer a new model for other states. The Maryland AADC seeks to create heightened protections for youth aged 17 and under and will apply to businesses that provide online […]