Search results

[…] s. T he AI Fra m ew ork Act ap plie s t o activ it ie s ca rrie d out both w it h in South Ko re a an d a b ro ad , as lo ng as th e y have a n im pact on th e dom […]

[…] our congressional testimony, FPF considers that the typical regulatory course is to be silent about fees between business parties, which can be addressed via contract and the free market. However, FPF recognizes the unique challenges raised in the open banking context since the data provider holds the information needed by the consumer and third […]

[…] the means to reasonably identify the individuals: if they do not process personal data, the GDPR does not apply.  On the other hand, pseudonymization is not a free pass. A dataset may still qualify as personal data: (1) if the recipient has reasonable means to re-identify the individual; (2) for the controller who holds […]

[…] heightened risk of harm to a consumer. C.R.S. § 6-1-1309(1). Where a type of processing is likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons. Art. 35(1). DPAs are required where processing activities pose some heightened risk of harm. A key difference between these regulations is whether that […]

[…] to opt-out, and appeal adverse decisions. It would also prohibit use of a high-risk AI system that produces algorithmic discrimination or has not passed an independent audit. Virginia HB 2094 (Veto’ed by Governor) Del. Maldonado (D) High-Risk AI / Automated Decisionmaking Would regulate AI systems used in consequential decisions, requiring entities to use reasonable […]

[…] strong concern that replicating the EU AI Act could create regulatory overreach. However, civil society groups argue that even comprehensive frameworks like the Colorado AI Act or Virginia’s HB 2094 (vetoed) are significantly narrower in scope and that highlighting that superficial similarities with the EU AI Act, such as shared definitions or structural references, […]

[…] including subscription-based and enterprise pricing models. As personalized AI systems increasingly replace, or are integrated into, online search, they will impact online content that has largely been free and ad-supported since the early Internet. However, it is not clear that personalized AI systems can, or should, adopt compensation strategies that follow the same historical […]

[…] of their risk classification. For AI systems in general, Brazil’s proposal includes:  The right to prior information about an interaction with an AI system, in an accessible, free of charge, and understandable format.  The right to privacy and the protection of personal data, following the Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (LGPD) and […]

This September, the Future of Privacy Forum will be participating in several events during the 47th Global Privacy Assembly in South Korea. The Global Privacy Assembly (GPA) is a leading international forum that brings together data protection and privacy authorities from around the world. Originally convened in 1979 as the International Conference of Data […]