Search results

[…] up to the age of 17 (although CT SB 3 creates similar protections for 13-17-year olds), child-directed privacy and online safety laws, including the California Age-Appropriate Design Code and Utah Senate Bill 152, have increasingly applied to the data and activity of teenagers up to age 17. 4. Expanded Rights to Access and Delete […]

[…] a data protection impact assessment (DPIA) prior to the processing of personal data, where such processing may likely result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of a data subject. The Act does not specify the period within which a DPIA must be conducted prior to such processing. Laws such as Kenya’s […]

[…] it is important to note that industrial policies from both central and local governments in China also exert substantial influence over the sector. Critically, the task to promote AI advancement amid escalating concerns is overseen by authorities other than the CAC, such as the Ministry of Science and Technology (“MST”) and the Ministry of […]

[…] the ever-changing digital environment and legal landscape,” said Alexa Mooney, policy counsel with FPF’s Youth & Education Privacy team. “While there is no single solution that will get us to that point, the recommendations and ideas outlined in this report provide a great place to start, and we hope will help advance this important […]

[…] features, including a mechanism to report “harmful or unwanted” behavior. The children’s and health provisions of SB 3 appear to be informed by the California Age-Appropriate Design Code (AADC) and the recently enacted Washington State My Health, My Data Act, respectively, but contain numerous important distinctions.  FPF has prepared a comparison chart to help […]

[…] owners to demonstrate their claims about the performance of their AI systems. Second, an organization’s use of AI Verify does not guarantee that tested AI systems are free from risks or biases, nor that they  are completely “safe” or “ethical.” Third, AI Verify is intended to preclude organizations from unintentionally divulging sensitive information from […]

[…] the Review Report’s proposal to grant the OAIC the power to determine codes of practice, the Report proposes that the OAIC should issue a “Children’s Online Privacy Code” for online services that are likely to be accessed by children. The Code would align with the UK’s Age Appropriate Design Code, and would provide guidance […]

[…] in California AADC, Section 2 defines “substantial harm or privacy risk” to include: mental health disorders; addictive behaviors; physical violence, online bullying and harassment; sexual exploitation; the promotion and marketing or tobacco, gambling, alcohol, or narcotic drugs; and predatory, unfair, or deceptive marketing practices or other financial harms. Both the California AADC and Section […]

[…] individuals”. As for “valid consent”, there are several conditions that must be met when obtaining it, pursuant to Article 11 of the Decree: The consent must be freely given and fully informed.  The consent must be explicitly and specifically expressed. This can be done in writing, orally, or through other clear actions, such as […]

[…] Sloan Foundation, a non-profit grantmaking institution whose mission is to enhance the welfare of all through the advancement of scientific knowledge. FPF’s Award Ceremony will be held virtually on May 10, 2023, and is free for anyone interested in learning more about these winning programs and data sharing. Register for the event here to RSVP.