Search results

[…] Lynne D. Roberts, Joel A. Howell, Kristen Seaman, and David C. Gibson, Student Attitudes toward Learning Analytics in Higher Education: “The Fitbit Version of the Learning World,” Frontiers in Psychology (2016), https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01959 . 53 Carrie Klein et al., Student Sensemaking of Learning Analytics Dashboard Interventions in Higher Education , Journal of Educational Technology Systems (2019), 48 […]

[…] ‘Digital Traces’ to Help Students. The University of Arizona News. (March 7, 2018). https://news.arizona.edu/story/researcher-looks-digital-traces-help-students. Borgman, C. L. Open Data, Grey Data, and Stewardship: Universities at the Privacy Frontier. Berkeley Technology Law Journal (2018) 33 (2): 365-412. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38B56D489. Botnevik S., Khalil M., and Wasson B. Student Awareness and Privacy Perception of Learning Analytics in Higher […]

[…] understand the need to protect student privacy and act accordingly. Building a culture of privacy requires JANUARY 2021 11 • ISTE: Standards for Students 22 • Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF): Surveillance Self-Defense: Privacy for Students 23 • Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA): Peer Privacy Protector Project (PPPP) 24 To learn more about student privacy, […]

[…] an overview of almost a dozen AI risk management frameworks that sit “at the intersection of traditional risk management and AI safety” (with a particular emphasis on frontier, general-purpose, or “high-risk” AI systems). The MIT initiative could serve as a starting point for companies who want to ground their AI risk-management in proven safety […]

[…] the same frameworks carries different legal weight and protection. The Proposed Laws and Their Application: Pending legislation across multiple states is building on these existing models, with frontier model bills expanding California’s approach, liability bills adopting Texas-style safe harbors, and ADMT bills blending Colorado’s hybrid of mandates and affirmative defenses. The Real Effect on […]

[…] the Chart here These enacted laws span a wide range of policy areas, reflecting experimentation in regulatory scope among lawmakers. In 2025 alone, states enacted laws addressing frontier model risk (such as California’s SB 53 and New York’s RAISE Act), generative AI transparency, AI use in health care settings, liability standards, data privacy, innovation, […]

[…] Act, ending months of uncertainty after the bill passed the legislature in June and making New York the second state to enact a statute specifically focused on frontier artificial intelligence (AI) safety and transparency. Sponsored by Assemblymember Bores (D) and Senator Gounardes (D), the law closely follows California’s enactment of SB 53 in late […]

What the enactment of New York’s RAISE Act reveals compared to California’s SB 53, the nation’s first frontier AI law On December 19, New York Governor Hochul (D) signed the Responsible AI Safety and Education (RAISE) Act, ending months of uncertainty after the bill passed the legislature in June and making New York the […]

[…] generative AI bills, amending Utah’s 2024 Artificial Intelligence Policy Act (AIPA) and establishing new regulations for mental health chatbots.  FPF compared California’s SB 53, the Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act (TFAIA) to the New York Raise Act anticipating where U.S. policy on frontier model safety may be headed, as this was signed into […]

State lawmakers accelerated their focus on AI regulation in 2025, proposing a vast array of new regulatory models. From chatbots and frontier models to healthcare, liability, and sandboxes, legislators examined nearly every aspect of AI as they sought to address its impact on their constituents. To help stakeholders understand this rapidly evolving environment, the […]