![Delhi City Pin On The Map](https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/iss_7018_05258-1-scaled.jpg)
India: Proposed Data Regulation Overhaul Includes New Draft Rules for Processing Non-Personal Data
Authors: Sameer Avasarala ——- Disclaimers This guest post is by Sameer Avasarala, a Data Protection and Technology Lawyer in Bengaluru. The material/opinion expressed is exclusively that of the author alone and does not expresses the views of Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas or any other firm / organization that the author is associated with. He can be […]
![Saracollins Headshot](https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/SaraCollins_Headshot.jpg)
Sara Collins
![Mike Hintze (cropped)](https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Mike-Hintze-cropped.png)
Mike Hintze
![Us Capitol Building 2225764 1920](https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/us-capitol-building-2225764_1920.jpg)
11th Annual Privacy Papers for Policymakers — Call for Nominations
The Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) invites privacy scholars and authors with an interest in privacy issues to nominate finished papers for consideration for FPF’s annual Privacy Papers for Policymakers Award. PURPOSE To recognize the year’s leading privacy research and analytical work that is relevant to policymakers in the United States Congress, at U.S. federal […]
![About Title](https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/about-title-2048x485.png)
Advisory Board
Members of the FPF Advisory Board provide input in support of transparency, user control, and the advancement of responsible data practices. By serving as advisors they are not responsible for the content of the website, nor do they necessarily endorse the positions taken by FPF. Advisors serve in a personal capacity and their affiliation does […]
![2 Dna](https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2_dna.jpg)
California SB 980 Would Codify Many of FPF’s Best Practices for Consumer Genetic Testing Services, but Key Differences Remain
Authors: John Verdi (Vice President of Policy) and Katelyn Ringrose (Christopher Wolf Diversity Law Fellow) In July 2018, the Future of Privacy Forum released Privacy Best Practices for Consumer Genetic Testing Services. FPF developed the Best Practices following consultation with technical experts, regulators, leading consumer genetic and personal genomic testing companies, and civil society. The […]
![Gdpr Age Of Digital Consent Spc Image](https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/GDPR-Age-of-Digital-Consent-SPC-Image.png)
The European Commission Considers Amending the General Data Protection Regulation to Make Digital Age of Consent Consistent
The European Commission published a Communication on its mandated two-year evaluation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on June 24, 2020 in which it discusses as a future policy development “the possible harmonisation of the age of children consent in relation to information society services.” Notably, harmonizing the age of consent for children across […]
![Screen Shot 2020 07 21 At 11.16.10 Am](https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Screen-Shot-2020-07-21-at-11.16.10-AM.png)
FPF & BrightHive Release Playbook to Create Responsible Contact Tracing Initiatives, Address Privacy & Ethics Concerns
A new playbook from the Future of Privacy Forum (FPF) and BrightHive, Responsible Data Use Playbook for Digital Contact Tracing, provides a series of considerations to assist stakeholders in setting up a digital contact tracing initiative to track and manage the spread of COVID-19, while addressing privacy concerns raised by these technologies in an ethical, […]